Table A3.
Friedman test results and post-hoc analysis for the second-level model.
| Friedman Test (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic | p-value | Result | |
| 362.345869 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected | |
| Friedman Value | Algorithm | Ranking | |
| 3.41825 | RF | 1 | |
| 3.45425 | SVM | 2 | |
| 3.45675 | DT | 3 | |
| 3.48625 | LR | 4 | |
| 3.49425 | KNN | 5 | |
| 3.69075 | NB | 6 | |
| Post-Hoc Analysis (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
| Comparison | Statistic | p-value | Result |
| NB vs. RF | 6.90914 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected |
| SVM vs. NB | 5.99637 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected |
| NB vs. DT | 5.93298 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected |
| NB vs. LR | 5.18502 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected |
| KNN vs. NB | 4.98218 | 0.00001 | H0 is rejected |
| KNN vs. RF | 1.92695 | 0.53986 | H0 is accepted |
| RF vs. LR | 1.72411 | 0.76218 | H0 is accepted |
| KNN vs. SVM | 1.01419 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| RF vs. DT | 0.97615 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| KNN vs. DT | 0.95080 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| SVM vs. RF | 0.91277 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| SVM vs. LR | 0.81135 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| LR vs. DT | 0.74796 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| KNN vs. LR | 0.20284 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| SVM vs. DT | 0.06339 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |