Table 1.
Histological variable | Model‐based weighted kappa (κ ma) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
DCIS grades 1, 2, and 3 (n = 411; intercept‐only model) | 0.50 | 0.44–0.56 |
DCIS grades 1 and 2 versus 3 (n = 411) | 0.51 | 0.43–0.59 |
DCIS grade 1 versus 2 and 3 (n = 411) | 0.45 | 0.41–0.50 |
DCIS grade as binary, low versus high (n = 411) | 0.52 | 0.45–0.59 |
Necrosis; absent versus present (n = 413, manually dichotomised) | 0.55 | 0.51–0.59 |
Calcifications; absent versus present (n = 413) | 0.51 | 0.48–0.55 |
Lymphocytic infiltrate; absent versus subtle versus prominent (n = 413) | 0.47 | 0.38–0.55 |
Periductal fibrosis; absent versus subtle versus prominent (n = 413) | 0.35 | 0.03–0.31 |
Mitoses; sparse versus many (n = 408) | 0.33 | 0.24–0.42 |
Architectural pattern; solid and comedo versus cribriform, flat, and (micro)papillary (n = 413) | 0.61 | 0.58–0.64 |
DCIS grade 1 denotes low grade, 2 intermediate grade, and 3 high grade.