Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;13(8):1956. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081956

Table 2.

Clinical features, treatment and outcomes of 692 retinoblastoma patients from 10 countries.

Feature All Cases
n = 894 Eyes in 692 Patients
Low-Income Country (LIC)
n = 98 Eyes of 74 Patients
Lower Middle-Income Countries (LMIC)
n = 392 Eyes of 294 Patients
Upper Middle-Income Countries (UMIC)
n = 319 Eyes of 254 Patients
High Income Countries (HIC)
n = 85 Eyes of 70 Patients
p-Value
Tumour laterality
Unilateral 490 (71) 50 (68) 196 (67) 189 (74) 55 (79) 0.09
Bilateral 202 (29) 24 (32) 98 (33) 65 (26) 15 (21)
8th edition AJCC
Tumour
T1 124 (14) 20 (20) 43 (11) 41 (13) 20 (24) 0.006 b
T2 397 (44) 33 (34) 144 (37) 175 (55) 45 (53) 0.23
T3 294 (33) 25 (26) 169 (43) 80 (25) 20 (24) 0.53
T4 79 (9) 20 (20) 36 (9) 23 (7) 0 (0) 0.0004 c
Lymph nodes
N0 672 (97) 60 (81) 289 (98) 253 (99) 70 (100) <0.0001 a
N1 20 (3) 14 (19) 5 (2) 1 (<1) 0 (0)
Metastasis
M0 654 (95) 62 (84) 274 (93) 248 (98) 70 (100) 0.13
M1 38 (5) 12 (16) 20 (7) 6 (2) 0 (0)
Primary treatment *
Focal treatment ** 132 (15) 20 (20) 35 (9) 55 (17) 22 (26) 0.27
IVC 381 (43) 18 (18) 204 (52) 131 (41) 28 (33) 0.51
IAC 121 (14) 0 (0) 2 (<1) 97 (30) 22 (26) 0.005 d
IviC 27 (3) 0 (0) 1 (<1) 20 (6) 6 (7) <0.0001 e
Enucleation 279 (31) 51 (52) 135 (34) 68 (21) 25 (29) 0.35
Treatment refusal 28 (3) 7 (7) 9 (2) 3 (<1) 0 (0) 0.03 f
Outcomes at the end of the study
Globe salvage 513 (59) 27 (30) 229 (58) 197 (62) 58 (68) <0.0001 g
HRF 179 (51) 40 (63) 75 (46) 61 (50) 3 (11) 0.31
Death 21 (3) 0 (0) 16 (5) 5 (2) 0 (0) 0.26

AJCC, American Joint Committee Classification; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; * Total is more than 100% since few patients received more than one form of primary treatment; ** argon laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy; IVC, intravenous chemotherapy; IAC, intra-arterial chemotherapy; IviC, intravitreal chemotherapy; HRF, high-risk histopathologic features. a LIC vs. LMIC (p < 0.001); LIC vs. UMIC (p < 0.001); LIC vs. HIC (p < 0.001). b HIC vs. LMIC (p = 0.003); HIC vs. UMIC (p = 0.014). c LIC vs. LMIC (p = 0.011); LIC vs. UMIC (p = 0.002); LIC vs. HIC (p < 0.001); LMIC vs. HIC (p = 0.009). d LMIC vs. HIC (p = 0.001). e LMIC vs. UMIC (p < 0.001); LMIC vs. HIC (p < 0.001). f LIC vs. HIC (p = 0.016). g LIC vs. LMIC (p < 0.001); LIC vs. UMIC (p < 0.001); LIC vs. HIC (p < 0.001).