Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;13(4):286. doi: 10.3390/toxins13040286

Table 1.

The EDS analysis of bacterial cells after being treated with physical and chemical treatment.

Treatment The Ratio of Each Chemical Elements N/C Ratio
C O N P K Na Cl Al S I Ca
Control 56.90 a,b 20.03 a,b 12.30 a 4.16 e 2.63 e 2.30 f 1.40 c 0.07 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.22 a,b
Urea 54.03 a 24.03 c 17.03 b,c 2.47 c,d 2.00 c,e 0.30 a,b,c 0.00 a 0.03 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.32 c
SDS 66.63 c 17.73 a 13.26 a,b 0.87 a 1.23 b 0.17 a 0.00 a 0.03 0.03 a,b 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.20 a
m-periodate 55.40 a,b 21.20 a,b,c 16.63 b,c 1.93 b,c 2.70 e 0.40 b,c 0.00 a 0.00 0.20 d 1.47 b 0.00 a 0.30 b,c
Polymyxin B 55.13 a 21.43 a,b,c 17.97 c 2.87 d 1.80 b,c 0.67 e 0.00 a 0.00 0.10 c 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.33 c
Pronase 62.03 b,c 21.30 a,b,c 11.97 a 2.03 b,c 1.90 c 0.27 a,b 0.00 a 0.00 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.56 b 0.19 a
Lipase 58.07 b 21.06 a,b,c 14.07 a,b,c 2.27 d 3.30 d 0.43 c 0.00 a 0.03 0.07 b,c 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.24 a,b,c
Heat 55.7 a,b 21.73 b,c 17.77 c 1.37 a,b 0.20 a 2.27 f 0.93 b 0.00 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.00 a 0.32 c

a–c Letters of each column indicated significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05. Values are means ± standard deviations of triplicate experiments.