Table 3.
Intergroup effects and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA 2×2) in relational Internet risks.
| Variables | M (SD) | F (η2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Pre-Test | Post-Test | Time Effect |
Group Effect |
Interaction Effect |
|
| Cyber victimization |
Intervention | 1.69 (2.35) |
2.32 (2.89) |
|||
| Control | 2.42 (3.93) |
3.77 (3.98) |
||||
| 13.44 *** (0.08) |
5.64 * (0.01) |
1.77 (0.02) |
||||
| Sexting | Intervention | 0.02 (0.15) |
0.09 (0.45) |
|||
| Control | 0.00 (0.00) |
0.06 (0.25) |
||||
| 3.13 (0.02) |
0.47 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
||||
| Online grooming |
Intervention | 0.29 (1.33) |
0.25 (1.11) |
|||
| Control | 0.04 (0.20) |
0.51 (1.29) |
||||
| 4.65 * (0.03) |
0.00 (0.00) |
6.20 * (0.04) |
||||
| Cyber dating abuse |
Intervention | 1.27 (1.95) |
0.27 (0.64) |
|||
| Control | 1.30 (2.86) |
0.20 (0.42) |
||||
| 4.03 (0.18) |
0.002 (0.00) |
0.009 (0.00) |
||||
η2 = partial eta squared * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.