Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Lasers Dent Sci. 2019 Dec 17;4(1):25–32. doi: 10.1007/s41547-019-00075-6

Table 2.

Patient age and VAS score in each group

Age VAS score1 Rate2
P2 P30
Control 33.3 ± 9 6.8 ± 1.3 5.1 ± 0.88 40%
Mecobalamine group
Treatment 34.1 ± 6.8 6.6 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 1.14 90%
PBM group
p value 0.82 0.73 <0.001 0.057
1

Avariation of VAS greater than 3 was regarded as a significant improvement by subjective evaluation. The preoperative VAS was 0 in all subjects of the two groups

2

The rate = patients with significant improvement in a group/number of patients in this group. The rate in this table was calculated 30 days after extraction