Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 9;155(5):755–765. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa179

Table 7.

Distribution of Telepathology and Nontelepathology Cases Based on Adequacy Assessment Provider

Team Member Total Cases, No. (%) Inadequate Cases,a No. (%) Inadequate Cases (% of Total), No. (%)
EBUS procedure (n = 339) (n = 53)
 Nontelepathology 121b (35.7) 26 (21.5) 121 (3.5)
  Cytotechnologist 7 (2.1) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  Resident 35 (10.3) 7 (20.0) 7 (2.1)
  Fellow 43 (12.7) 12 (27.9) 12 (3.5)
  Junior cytopathologist 16 (4.7) 6 (37.5) 6 (1.8)
  Senior cytopathologist 19 (5.6) 1 (5.3) 1 (0.3)
 Telepathology 218 (64.3) 27 (12.4) 27 (8.0)
  Junior cytopathologist 96 (1.8) 8 (8.3) 8 (2.4)
  Senior cytopathologist 122 (36.0) 19 (15.6) 19 (5.6)
EUS procedure (n = 438) (n = 18)
 Nontelepathology 129 (29.5) 8 (0.6) 8 (1.8)
  Cytotechnologist 1 (0.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  Resident 39 (8.9) 2 (5.1) 2 (0.5)
  Fellow 49 (11.2) 5 (10.2) 5 (1.1)
  Junior cytopathologist 13 (10.1) 1 (7.7) 1 (0.2)
  Senior cytopathologist 27 (3.0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Telepathology 309 (70.5) 10 (3.2) 10 (2.3)
  Junior cytopathologist 101 6 (5.9) 6 (1.4)
  Senior cytopathologist 208 4 (1.9) 4 (0.9)

EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.

aPercentage calculated out of total cases in that subgroup (eg, 7 of 35 or 20% of resident EBUS cases were inadequate).

bOne (0.8%) EBUS case with no provider data available.