Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;11(4):1006–1014. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab011
Self-monitoring Reported calorie intake
Estimate SE df t p Estimate SE df t p
Intercept 0.66 0.16 315.5 4.09 <0.001*** 0.60 0.16 307.8 3.69 <0.001***
Session number –0.53 0.005 6685 –104.78 <0.001*** –0.53 0.005 6658 –95.04 <0.001***
Discrepancy change –0.88 0.46 93.65 –1.91 0.06 –0.67 0.35 175.9 –1.92 0.06
Responder status –3.25 0.29 429.7 –14.55 <0.001*** –3.24 0.22 431.9 –14.47 <0.001***
Clinician-rated adherence –0.48 0.04 6861 –11.91 <0.001*** –0.45 0.04 6857 –11.15 <0.001***
Discrepancy change × session 0.16 0.02 6651 8.94 <0.001*** 0.14 0.01 6608 9.78 <0.001***

* p < 0.05. Discrepancy change scores were computed as the mean difference in discrepancy score from Sessions 1–10 to Sessions 11–20 for each subject and for each adherence measure. Mean change to self-monitoring adherence discrepancy from first to second half of treatment was 0.23 (SD = 0.82); mean change to reported calorie intake discrepancy from first to second half of treatment was 0.54 (SD = 1.18). All models included subject and clinician as a random effect, included a random slope and intercept for Discrepancy Score, used an unstructured covariance matrix and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Satterwhaite approximations were used to estimate degrees of freedom and p-values. Session Number ranged from 1 to 20 and responder status was effect-coded (0 = non-responder at either Week 3 or Week 7, 1 = responder). For self-monitoring, AIC = 28543.6, BIC = 28632.73. For reported calorie intake, AIC = 28527.3, BIC = 28616.42.