Table 1.
Encapsulation techniques | Encapsulate structure(s) | Typical size range | Critical parameters | Merits | Demerits | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional approaches | ||||||
Spray drying | The diameter of particles about 5–20 µm (varies with the size of the nozzle) |
Temperature -optimization of temperature is required to maintain the viability of probiotics as well as product with less residual moisture content. Approximately inlet temperature ranges between 110–160 °C and outlet temperature ranges between 55–85 °C. The concentration of wall material—normally in the range of 15–50% (w/v). Low concentration (less viscous) is preferable to avoid clogging and for easy atomization. The feed flow rate in a range of 2–12 ml/min (vary based on chamber capacity, nozzle size, atomization air flow rate, and aspirator rate) |
Rapid process, continuously operatable single process unit for particle formation, high reproducibility, low operational/production cost, easily scalable without major modifications, and adaptability to most common industrial equipment; The liquid feed system can operate at relatively low pressure; Powders obtained by spray drying have better flow properties; Suitable for the production of monodisperse powders with particle size in the micrometer scale; Particle size can be optimized by changing nozzle size, design, and operation parameters; The smooth skin-forming ability of the spray-dried particles offer a protective environment to the entrapped probiotic cells |
High capital cost, expensive maintenance, low yield due to the loss of product in the walls of the drying chamber; The feed solution has to be pumpable for the atomization process (low viscous solution/ slurry/ suspension). Hence, spray drying is not suitable for highly viscous feed material; Thermal inactivation of probiotics due to high inlet temperature and evaporation rates causes cellular damage to probiotic cells; High temperature does not have a direct impact on the viability of probiotics; rather, it depends on the time–temperature combination that decides the extent of microbial inactivation during spray drying. Short-time exposure might avoid thermal inactivation; Shear force/ stress acting on the core and air occlusion in the atomized droplet during atomization have a direct impact on the viability of probiotics; The loss of viability also depends on the type of carrier/wall material used |
[106–108, 121, 126, 128, 129, 241, 242] | |
Freeze-drying | Irregular in shape, particle size > 1 mm, polydisperse (broad particle size distribution) |
Condenser temperature should be less than the product temperature during the sublimation process of freeze-drying Vacuum pressure: 0.1- 0.5 Torr. Lower pressure is preferred for the sublimation process |
Highly porous structure, better rehydration, and solubility; Sublimation of moisture under vacuum avoids water phase transition and oxidation |
Longer drying time, high energy consumption, and high operational/ production costs limit their commercial-scale application; More expensive (30–50 times higher than the spray drying process); Amorphous and hygroscopic irregular porous structure leads to stability loss of the product (core instability due to large air–solid interface); Probiotic cells are entrapped close to the surface of freeze-dried powders, which affects the stability of probiotics during transit through the acidic conditions of the upper GI tract |
[121, 134, 242, 243] | |
Extrusion technique | Microbeads around 0.5- 3 mm diameter (varies with needle gauge size) | Concentration of gelling agent (0.5–2.5% w/v), solution pH and viscosity, ionic strength and concentration of cross-linker solution (concentration 2–5% w/w), and reaction time |
Simple and inexpensive method; Gentle operation—provides better probiotic viability and protects the cells from damage; It does not involve deleterious solvents and can be done under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions |
Difficult to scale-up at the industry level due to slow process and very low production capacity; Particles with larger size distribution (polydispersity); Limited choice of wall material |
[151, 241, 244] | |
Emulsion technique | Emulsion size about 25 µm – 2 mm | Speed of agitation, phase-volume ratio, emulsifier type, solution pH, and viscosity |
Probiotics entrapment in the oil phase of protein-stabilized emulsions protected the cells when exposed to GI tract enzymes/ acids; High survival rate of encapsulated probiotics; The emulsion methods produce capsules sized from a few micrometers to 1 mm |
Particles with extremely large size distribution (polydispersity) and low yield; Controlled stirring and homogenization are required to achieve a narrow particle size distribution; High-shear process—prolonged shear forces may cause damage to cells which affects the viability of probiotics during processing |
[118, 158, 243] | |
Emerging approaches | ||||||
Spray-freeze-drying | The diameter of particles is about 20–80 µm (varies with the size of the nozzle) |
Concentration of feed solution, viscosity, feed flow rate, nozzle size, atomization air flow rate, aspirator rate, and type of cryogenic medium. Also during freeze-drying, the conditions such as shelf temperature, vacuum pressure, and drying time |
Spray-freeze-dried particles exhibits controlled size and large specific surface area than spray-dried particles; Excellent reconstitution capacity; Improved yield as compared to the spray drying process; Low-density particles with porous nature; Spray-freeze-dried probiotic microcapsules showed high cell viability and stability |
High energy consumption, more expensive and requires additional coating/ capsule for protection against adverse environmental conditions; It requires cryogenic medium (liquid nitrogen/ liquid hydrogen/ liquid argon); Dual stress (thermal and osmotic stress) to the probiotic cells; To prevent viability loss during quick freezing, stabilizing additives are required |
[121, 138, 167, 241, 245] | |
Refractance window drying | Flaky structure with a preferred thickness, after blending the particle size > 1 mm, polydisperse (broad particle size distribution) | The temperature of hot water (for probiotics preferably 40–60 °C), concentration/ total soluble solids of the feed solution, feed layer thickness, and drying time |
Dried products are of high quality due to the self-limiting dehydration method; Suitable for heat-sensitive materials; A simple and inexpensive method with less energy consumption; Rapid drying at atmospheric pressure; A suitable method for drying low viscous liquids, high viscous slurries, purees, pastes, wet solids/ slices of fruits and vegetables |
Inconvenient in handling powder with high sugar content; exhibits high stickiness due to their hygroscopic nature and high ˚brix | [171, 246, 247] | |
Electrohydrodynamic processes |
The average diameter of electrospun probiotic fibers is around 100–150 nm with a probiotic bead size of 300–800 nm; The diameter of electrosprayed particles around 200–800 nm |
Solution parameters such as molecular weight of polymer, concentration, viscosity, conductivity, and surface tension. Process parameters are applied voltage, flow rate, and tip-target distance |
Encapsulation without application of heat with relatively high encapsulation efficiency; Monodisperse electrosprayed particles with a high surface area; Electrospun fibers with high reproducibility and yield |
Low throughput technology—difficult to scale-up; Challenge of mass production—low yield (typically in the range of milligrams/hour); High voltage electrohydrodynamic processes can be injurious to cells and can affect probiotics cell viability |
[147, 248, 249] |