Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;11:8930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88371-9

Table 2.

Comparison between ophthalmological outcomes of eyes with and without vitreous floaters among patients with unilateral symptomatic eyes.

Unilateral vitreous floaters Symptomatic eyes with vitreous floater (n = 163) Contralateral eyes without vitreous floater (n = 163) P-value+
BCVA (logMAR) 0.06 ± 0.11 0.04 ± 0.08 0.09
S.E. (D) − 0.7 ± 2.2 − 0.5 ± 1.9 0.02
IOP (mmHg) 14.7 ± 3.2 15.2 ± 3.0 0.02
CMT (μm) 259.4 ± 20.2 260.0 ± 19.5 0.56
pRNFL (μm) thickness 100.7 ± 11.6 100.5 ± 11.4 0.08
pVO on UWF 0.04
None 60 eyes (36.8%) 133 eyes (81.6%)
pVO 103 eyes (63.2%) 30 eyes (18.4%)
PVD on SD-OCT (*) (86 eyes total) (86 eyes total) < 0.001
Stage 0 4 (4.7%) 9 (10.5%)
Stage 1 6 (6.9%) 12 (13.9%)
Stage 2 5 (5.8%) 30 (34.9%)
Stage 3 5 (5.8%) 10 (11.6%)
Stage 4 66 (76.7%) 25 (29.1%)

*PVD was staged according to SD-OCT finding as Stage A (perifoveal), Stage B (macular PVD with vitreopapillary adhesion), and Stage C (complete PVD). The SD-OCT data for 53% (86 out of 163 eyes) were available.

+P-value was calculated using the Student t test for numerical values and Fisher exact test for categorical values.

BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, S.E. spherical equivalents, D diopters, IOP intraocular pressure, CMT central macular thickness, pRNFL peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, pVO peripapillary vitreous opacity, UWF ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, PVD posterior vitreous detachment, SD-OCT spectral domain-optical coherence tomography.