Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;11:8986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88394-2

Table 2.

Selection of the best model.

Model I Model II Model III Model IV
χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P χ2 P
Both years 5.85 0.12 21.47  < 0.0001 29.54  < 0.0001 65.17  < 0.0001
2017 3.39 0.33 13.65 0.003 20.59 0.0001 39.42  < 0.0001
2018 3.13 0.37 8.58 0.035 9.69 0.02 26.69  < 0.0001
2017 M600 1.79 0.62 6.16 0.104 11.17 0.01 19.38 0.0002
2017 B400 2.24 0.52 7.98 0.046 9.89 0.02 20.46 0.0001
2018 M600 4.98 0.083 6.89 0.032 4.23 0.120 14.48 0.0007
2018 M1000 4.24 0.236 7.75 0.051 21.88  < 0.0001 19.03 0.0002

Observed transition probabilities were compared against predicted values for each of the four models of patch attractiveness (defined in the text). The Chi-square value and associated probability, P value, are presented here. A model with a probability > 0.05 (bolded) indicates a good fit to the empirical data.