Table 2.
Hazard ratios for death from breast cancer for selected variables.
| Variables | Cases/total | Univariate HR (95% CI) P value | Multivariatea HR (95% CI) P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis | |||
| <=40 | 38/243 | 1 | 1 |
| 41–50 | 31/252 | 0.81 (0.51–1.31) 0.39 | 0.94 (0.58–1.53) 0.81 |
| 50+ | 22/169 | 1.00 (0.60–1.79) 0.97 | 1.01 (0.58–1.75) 0.98 |
| BC size | |||
| <=10 | 7/127 | 1 | 1 |
| 11–20 | 31/222 | 2.95 (1.30–6.69) 0.01 | 2.41 (1.04–5.58) 0.04 |
| >20 | 39/233 | 4.09 (1.83–19.2) 0.0006 | 3.13 (1.33–7.35) 0.009 |
| Endocrine therapy | |||
| None | 24/198 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamoxifen alone | 45/308 | 1.36 (0.83–2.23) 0.23 | 1.11 (0.62–1.98) 0.73 |
| AI alone | 6/49 | 1.45 (0.59–3.55) 0.42 | 1.56 (0.56–4.33) 0.40 |
| Both | 3/23 | 0.98 (0.30–3.26) 0.98 | 1.24 (0.35–4.42) 0.74 |
| Either | 54/380 | 1.34 (0.84–2.17) 0.23 | 1.13 (0.64–2.00) 0.67 |
| Grade | |||
| 1/2 | 34/248 | 0.97 (0.59–1.58) 0.89 | 1.17 (0.70–1.96) 0.55 |
| 3 | 31/236 | 1 | 1 |
| ER status | |||
| Negative | 12/107 | 1 | 1 |
| Positive | 60/455 | 1.29 (0.69–2.39) 0.43 | 1.23 (0.62–2.45) 0.55 |
| Nodal status | |||
| Negative | 34/310 | 1 | 1 |
| Positive | 48/278 | 1.83 (1.18–2.84) 0.007 | 1.67 (1.00–2.79) 0.05 |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| No | 19/165 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 54/419 | 1.24 (0.73–2.09) 0.42 | 0.83 (0.65–1.53) 0.56 |
| Contralateral mastectomy | |||
| No | 58/345 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 32/307 | 0.56 (0.36–0.88) 0.009 | 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 0.17 |
| Missing | 1/12 | ||
| Oophorectomy | |||
| No | 59/287 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 32/377 | 0.37 (0.24–0.58) <0.001 | 0.45 (0.28–0.72) 0.0009 |
| Yes, within 1 year | 8/82 | 0.45 (0.21–0.93) 0.03 | 0.56 (0.26–1.21) 0.14 |
| Yes, 1–2 years after diagnosis | 18/184 | 0.42 (0.25–0.71) 0.001 | 0.51 (0.29–0.91) 0.02 |
| Yes, 3+ years after diagnosis | 6/111 | 0.23 (0.10–0.55) 0.001 | 0.28 (0.12–0.67) 0.004 |
| Yes, age at ooph <50 | 24/245 | 0.42 (0.26–0.67) 0.0004 | 0.51 (0.30–0.87) 0.01 |
| Y, age at ooph >=50 | 8/132 | 0.28 (0.13–0.60) 0.0009 | 0.33 (0.15–0.74) 0.007 |
aAdjusted by all the variables; the 12 subjects missing PM data were supposed as no PM in the estimation on the RR of factors other than PM.