Table 3.
Relative contribution of ultra-processed foods (UPF, % of total energy intake) in relation to obesity and hypertension, stratified by education or age group, among Canadian adults aged ≥ 19 years, 2015 CCHS–Nutrition
Outcome | Stratified Models | n | UPF consumption (continuous)† | UPF consumption (tertiles)‡ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | Tertile 2, OR (95% CI) | Tertile 3, OR (95% CI) | |||
Obesitya | High school or less | 5327 | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) | 0.93 (0.70–1.22) | 0.95 (0.70–1.28) |
Trade/college/CEGEP | 3667 | 1.05 (0.98–1.12) | 1.23 (0.85–1.78) | 1.35 (0.94–1.94) | |
University diploma | 3551 | 1.18 (1.09–1.28)*** | 1.17 (0.81–1.70) | 2.17 (1.45–3.24)*** | |
Hypertensionb | 19-50 years | 6080 | 1.16 (1.07–1.26)*** | 1.45 (0.87–2.41) | 2.69 (1.68–4.31)*** |
51–64 years | 3317 | 1.04 (0.96–1.12) | 1.09 (0.75–1.58) | 1.25 (0.84–1.87) | |
65+ years | 4018 | 1.09 (1.03–1.16)** | 1.54 (1.20–1.99)*** | 1.45 (1.07–1.96)* |
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001
†Odds ratios per 10% increase in relative intake of ultra-processed foods (% of total energy intake)
‡Tertile 1 (lowest) is the reference. Threshold values for tertiles of ultra-processed food intake were as follows: tertile 1: ≤ 38.5% kcal/day; tertile 2: 38.6–58.6% kcal/day; tertile 3: ≥ 58.7% kcal/day
Estimates presented in the table are odds ratios derived from logistic regression models generated separately for each health outcome and stratified by education level or age group
aObesity models, stratified by education level, are adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, income, residential area, immigration status, Indigenous identity, reporting group, measurement type
bHypertension models, stratified by age group, are adjusted for sex, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, income, educational attainment, residential area, immigration status, Indigenous identity