Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;112(3):421–429. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00429-9

Table 3.

Relative contribution of ultra-processed foods (UPF, % of total energy intake) in relation to obesity and hypertension, stratified by education or age group, among Canadian adults aged ≥ 19 years, 2015 CCHS–Nutrition

Outcome Stratified Models n UPF consumption (continuous)† UPF consumption (tertiles)‡
OR (95% CI) Tertile 2, OR (95% CI) Tertile 3, OR (95% CI)
Obesitya High school or less 5327 1.01 (0.96–1.07) 0.93 (0.70–1.22) 0.95 (0.70–1.28)
Trade/college/CEGEP 3667 1.05 (0.98–1.12) 1.23 (0.85–1.78) 1.35 (0.94–1.94)
University diploma 3551 1.18 (1.09–1.28)*** 1.17 (0.81–1.70) 2.17 (1.45–3.24)***
Hypertensionb 19-50 years 6080 1.16 (1.07–1.26)*** 1.45 (0.87–2.41) 2.69 (1.68–4.31)***
51–64 years 3317 1.04 (0.96–1.12) 1.09 (0.75–1.58) 1.25 (0.84–1.87)
65+ years 4018 1.09 (1.03–1.16)** 1.54 (1.20–1.99)*** 1.45 (1.07–1.96)*

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001

Odds ratios per 10% increase in relative intake of ultra-processed foods (% of total energy intake)

Tertile 1 (lowest) is the reference. Threshold values for tertiles of ultra-processed food intake were as follows: tertile 1: ≤ 38.5% kcal/day; tertile 2: 38.6–58.6% kcal/day; tertile 3: ≥ 58.7% kcal/day

Estimates presented in the table are odds ratios derived from logistic regression models generated separately for each health outcome and stratified by education level or age group

aObesity models, stratified by education level, are adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, income, residential area, immigration status, Indigenous identity, reporting group, measurement type

bHypertension models, stratified by age group, are adjusted for sex, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, income, educational attainment, residential area, immigration status, Indigenous identity