Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 16;58(6):2109–2120. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04720-y

Table 1.

Analysis of physicochemical parameters of Cabernet Sauvignon wines of four winemaking areas after AF

Wine areas Color intensity Hue Volatile acidity (g/L) Alcohol (%vol) Dry extracts (g/L) Residual sugar (g/L) Total acidity (g/L) pH
Tianshanbeilu 9.52 ± 2.66b 0.84 ± 0.08 0.44 ± 0.05 12.88 ± 0.76 31.09 ± 2.02c 2.1 ± 0.45ab 5.23 ± 0.45 3.81 ± 0.23
Yili 9.17 ± 1.67b 0.77 ± 0.05 0.4 ± 0.06 12.81 ± 0.67 32.56 ± 4.11ac 2.29 ± 0.4a 5.75 ± 0.52 3.77 ± 0.17
Yanqi 12.67 ± 1.17ab 0.81 ± 0.05 0.45 ± 0.04 13.49 ± 0.73 36.41 ± 1.98ab 1.56 ± 0.12b 5.26 ± 0.27 3.82 ± 0.02
Hami 13.59 ± 1.61a 0.83 ± 0.12 0.5 ± 0.03 13.76 ± 0.33 38.08 ± 1.03a 1.75 ± 0.23ab 5.36 ± 0.25 3.82 ± 0.01

In the same column, letters indicate the significant differences of four producing areas which were conducted with Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05