Skip to main content
Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Surgical Case Reports
. 2021 Apr 27;7:104. doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01189-5

INI1-negative colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features and postoperative rapidly growing liver metastases: a case report and review of the literature

Masatsugu Kojima 1,, Toru Miyake 1, Tomoyuki Ueki 1, Hiroyuki Ohta 2, Ryoji Kushima 3, Masanori Shiohara 3, Hiroo Mizuta 4, Hiroya Iida 1, Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi 1, Sachiko Kaida 1, Katsushi Takebayashi 1, Hiromitsu Maehira 1, Yusuke Nishina 2, Tomoharu Shimizu 5, Eiji Mekata 2, Masaji Tani 1
PMCID: PMC8076409  PMID: 33903966

Abstract

Background

Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are extremely rare. They can occur in various organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, with common clinical features of high malignancy and poor prognosis.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old man visited our hospital complaining of lower abdominal pain and fever. Computed tomography (CT) revealed two wall-thickening lesions in the rectum and sigmoid colon, with the latter invading the small intestine and abdominal wall. Lymph nodes were swollen in the sigmoid mesocolon and at the roots of the inferior mesenteric artery. Colonoscopy revealed a circular type 3 lesion in the sigmoid colon and a semicircular type 2 lesion in the rectum. Biopsies of the sigmoid colon and rectum lesions revealed poorly and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma cells, respectively. The sigmoid colon, rectum, invaded small intestine, and abdominal wall were resected; lymph node dissection was also performed. Histopathological finding of the sigmoid colon lesion revealed that the tumor cells had poor connectivity with each other, and each cell had eosinophilic cytoplasm and a polymorphic nucleus. These characteristics are termed rhabdoid features, because the morphology of these cells is similar to that of rhabdomyosarcoma tumor cells. Immunohistochemical examination showed that the tumor cells were positive for both epithelial (cytokeratin AE1/AE3) and mesenchymal cell markers (vimentin); however, they were negative for integrase interactor 1 (INI1). Therefore, the sigmoid colorectal cancer was diagnosed as an INI1-negative undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features. The patient continued to experience high fever after surgery; thus, we performed an abdominal CT scan that revealed cystic lesions in the liver 4 days after surgery. These were absent in the positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scan performed 14 days before surgery. These tumors grew rapidly, and fine needle aspiration cytology revealed that they were undifferentiated carcinomas compatible with metastatic lesions from the undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features from the sigmoid colon. Chemotherapy was administered but was not effective. The patient died 60 days after surgery.

Conclusions

INI1-negative colorectal undifferentiated carcinomas with rhabdoid features are extremely rare, have high histological malignancy, and a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is not effective. Effective systemic therapy is desired.

Keywords: INI1/SMARCB1, Colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma, Rhabdoid feature, Rhabdoid tumor

Background

Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are extremely rare. They occur in various organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, and they have common clinical features such as high malignancy and poor prognosis [1]. Integrate interactor 1 (INI1) is a protein encoded by the tumor suppressor gene SMARCB1. INI1-deficient colorectal carcinoma has a high histological malignancy, large tumor diameter, and poor prognosis [2]. Approximately half of malignant tumors with rhabdoid features in the gastrointestinal tract lack INI1 expression [1]. Here, we report the case of an extremely rare INI1-negative undifferentiated colorectal carcinoma with rhabdoid features in the sigmoid colon, which caused the rapid progression of liver metastases after surgery.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old man visited our hospital complaining of lower abdominal pain and fever for 2 weeks. He did not have a remarkable medical history. The detailed family history was unknown, because he and his parents were not close to their relatives. He had no siblings or children, and what they knew for sure was that his parents and grandparents had no history of cancer. Laboratory findings revealed mild inflammation; WBC was 8,940/μL, and CRP level was 1.08 mg/dL. He also had mild anemia with his hemoglobin level at 11.1 g/dL. The levels of the tumor markers, CEA and CA19-9 were within the normal range; moreover, sIL-2R levels were normal. The computed tomography (CT) scan showed two wall-thickening lesions in the rectum and sigmoid colon, with the latter invading the small intestine and abdominal wall (Fig. 1a). Lymph nodes were swollen in the sigmoid mesocolon and at the roots of the inferior mesenteric artery, which had sac-like degeneration inside (Fig. 1b, c). A colonoscopy revealed a circular type 3 lesion in the sigmoid colon and a semicircular type 2 lesion in the rectum (Fig. 2a, b). The biopsy result of rectum lesion was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; and the biopsy of the sigmoid colon lesion showed that round cells with swollen nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm proliferated separately with each other. We suspected that the sigmoid colon lesion was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. A positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scan showed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation in the sigmoid colon lesion, rectal lesion, and swollen lymph nodes; however, no distant metastases were demonstrated (Fig. 2c). We preoperatively diagnosed the case as rectal and sigmoid colon cancer with lymph node metastases without distant metastases. Sigmoidectomy, low anterior resection, and lymph node dissection were performed. The sigmoid colon cancer invaded into the small intestine, abdominal wall, and vas deferens, which were resected together. The tumor and sigmoid mesocolon were markedly swollen and occupied the pelvic entrance; moreover, the sigmoid mesocolon was strongly adhered to the retroperitoneum due to inflammation. White nodules that were present in the sigmoid mesocolon were removed; we suspected that these might be involved in peritoneal dissemination. The excised specimens are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Computed tomography (CT) scan showed two wall-thickening lesions in the rectum (arrowhead) and sigmoid colon (arrow), with the latter invading the small intestine and abdominal wall (a). Lymph nodes were swollen in the sigmoid mesocolon (b) and at the roots of the inferior mesenteric artery (c). Some of the swollen lymph nodes had sac-like degeneration inside (b)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Colonoscopy revealed a circular type 3 lesion in the sigmoid colon (a) and a semicircular type 2 lesion in the rectum (b). A positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scan showed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation in the sigmoid colon lesion, rectal lesion, and swollen lymph nodes (c)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. A circumferential type 3 lesion was found in the sigmoid colon (arrow), and a semicircular type 2 lesion was found in the rectum (arrowhead). The sigmoid colon lesion invaded the small intestine, vas deferens (dashed arrow), which were resected together

Histopathological findings revealed that the rectal cancer was a typical moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. However, the sigmoid colon cancer had different features including tumor cells with polymorphic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. These cells had poor connectivity with each other. These characteristics are called rhabdoid features, because the morphology of these cells is similar to that of rhabdomyosarcoma tumor cells (Fig. 4a). Immunohistochemical examination showed that the tumor cells were positive for both epithelial (cytokeratin AE1/AE3) and mesenchymal cell markers (vimentin). However, these cells were negative for INI1, which is normally expressed in the nucleus of cells (Fig. 4b–e). Therefore, the sigmoid colon cancer was diagnosed as an INI1-negative undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features. Moreover, CDX2, which is a marker of colonocytes differentiation, was negative (Fig. 4f); and Ki67, which shows proliferative ability, was as high as 40%. The white nodules on the sigmoid mesocolon were diagnosed as peritoneal dissemination, and the multiple lymph nodes were also diagnosed as metastatic. The final diagnosis was sigmoid colon cancer; pT4b (small intestine, abdominal wall) N2b M1c pStage IVC (peritoneal dissemination), and rectal cancer; pT3(SS) N0.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sigmoid colon tumor cells had polymorphic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. These cells had poor connectivity with each other. These characteristics are called rhabdoid features, because the morphology of these cells is similar to that of rhabdomyosarcoma tumor cells (HE × 200) (a). Immunohistochemical examination showed that the tumor cells were positive for both epithelial (cytokeratin AE1/AE3) (× 200) (b) and mesenchymal cell markers (vimentin) (× 200) (c). These tumor cells were negative for INI1 (arrow), on the other hand, the surrounding non-neoplastic cells were positive for INI1 (arrowhead) (× 400) (d). Contrast to the tumor cells, non-tumor crypt epithelium cells were INI1 positive (× 100) (e). The tumor cells were negative for CDX2, which is a marker of colonocytes differentiation (× 200) (f)

On day 4 after surgery, the patient continued to experience high fever of ≥ 38 °C. To examine the presence of lesions that could be causing the fever, an abdominal CT scan was performed, which revealed cystic lesions in liver segments S1 and S7 (Fig. 5a). These lesions were absent in the PET-CT scan performed 14 days before surgery. These lesions grew rapidly 11 days after surgery, as confirmed by CT (Fig. 5b); therefore, we suspected that the lesions were liver abscesses or metastases. A fine needle aspiration cytology revealed undifferentiated carcinoma cells compatible with metastatic lesions from the undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features from the sigmoid colon. Chemotherapy, comprising modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin and an infusion of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV)) plus bevacizumab, was administered on postoperative day 22. However, after the second course, CT showed that the number and size of the liver metastases had progressed by postoperative day 47 (Fig. 5c). The molecular analysis indicated that the sigmoid colon cancer was KRAS and NRAS-wild, BRAFV600E-mutant, and microsatellite stable (MSS). The chemotherapy regimen was then changed to FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and an infusion of 5FU/LV) plus bevacizumab; however, the general condition of the patient rapidly deteriorated, and he died on postoperative day 60.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Abdominal CT revealed new cystic lesions appeared in liver segment S1 (a, arrow) and S7 (not shown) 4 days after surgery. These lesions grew rapidly 11 days after surgery (b). The fine needle aspiration cytology revealed that these were metastatic lesions from the undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features. Chemotherapy was ineffective and they continued to progress 47 days after surgery (c)

Discussion

Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are extremely rare and were first reported by Beckwith and Palmer in 1978 as a sarcomatoid subtype of Wilms tumor in the kidneys of fetuses and children [3]. Since then, it has been reported that malignant tumors with rhabdoid features can occur in various organs other than the kidneys in adults. Despite this diversity, these tumors have common clinical features, such as extremely high malignancy and poor prognosis [1, 2]. Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are associated with carcinoma, sarcoma, and carcinosarcoma, depending on the tissue it develops in [4, 5]. In colorectal adenocarcinomas, they are named undifferentiated carcinomas with rhabdoid features.

Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features have cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, oval or circular nuclei with prominent nucleoli, and vitreous inclusion bodies [6]. Although these tumors are morphologically sarcoma-like, immunohistochemical examination shows them to be negative for muscular markers and positive for epithelial (e.g., cytokeratin AE1/AE3) and mesenchymal cell markers (e.g., vimentin) [7]. Tumor cells have low adhesion, high mitotic potential, and are prone to infiltrate other organs. These histological features were also observed in the present case; the liver metastases discovered after surgery increased extremely rapidly and aggressively in both number and size. Furthermore, we detected cystic degeneration due to central necrosis, which was similar to liver abscesses. A preoperative CT scan revealed that some lymph node metastases showed cystic degeneration.

Malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are of two types: the first is entirely composed of undifferentiated carcinoma cells (pure type), whereas the second consists of not only undifferentiated carcinoma cells but also carcinoma cells with a high degree of differentiation in developing organs (composite type). The presence of composite type suggests that the rhabdoid features could have been developed from dedifferentiating from differentiated malignant cells [1, 8].

INI1 is a protein encoded by the tumor suppressor gene, SMARCB1. It constitutes the switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex, which is thought to function in an ATP-dependent manner to cause a conformational change in the nucleosome that alters histone-DNA binding, thereby facilitating transcription factor access [911]. INI1 is normally expressed in the nucleus of cells; however, its expression is known to be lack or reduced in rhabdoid tumor cells [9, 10]. In a study that examined 3051 cases of colorectal cancers, the INI1-encoding gene was deleted in 14 cases (0.46%) [2]. INI1-deficient colorectal carcinomas have a high histological malignancy, large tumor diameter, and poor prognosis [2]. Approximately half of gastrointestinal undifferentiated carcinomas with rhabdoid features lack INI1 expression [1]; INI1-encoding gene deletion appears to be crucial for the development of rhabdoid features in some cases [1, 10, 11].

Large intestine-derived malignant tumors with rhabdoid features are rare [12], and to date, only 28 cases (including the current case) of colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features have been reported (Table 1) [1, 5, 1236]. These cases have been reported in 17 men and 11 women. The average age of these patients was 64.5 years (range: 23–87 years). The right colon (cecum to transverse colon) was the most common site of carcinoma occurrence in 16 cases (57.1%), followed by the left colon (descending colon to sigmoid colon) in 6 cases (21.4%), and the rectum in 6 cases (21.4%). The average tumor diameter was 9.4 cm (range, 4–17 cm). Of all, the lymph nodes metastases were reported in 20 cases (71.4%), the liver in 7 cases (25%), peritoneal dissemination in 4 cases (14.3%), and the lungs in 2 cases (7.1%). Regarding INI1, 57% reported cases were negative, which was almost the same rate that reported before in gastrointestinal tract undifferentiated cancer with rhabdoid features [1].

Table 1.

Reported colorectal cancer with rhabdoid features (N = 28)

No Author Year Age Gender Site Size (cm) Treatment Histology Outcome Metastasis INI1 expression RAS, BRAF, MSI
1 Chetty et al. [13] 1993 72 M Cecum 6 × 5x2 Surgery Composite Dead 3 mo Liver, LN ND ND
2 Yang et al. [14] 1994 75 M Transverse 15 × 10x5 Surgery Pure Dead 0.5 mo LN ND ND
3 Macak et al. [15] 1995 50 M Transverse 6 × 5x3.5 Surgery Composite Not reported LN ND ND
4 Marcus et al. [16] 1996 84 F Transverse 7 Surgery Pure Dead 3 mo None ND KRAS, NRAS, HRAS WT
5 Nakamura et al. [17] 1999 76 M Cecum 14 × 8x6 Surgery Pure Dead 3 mo Liver, LN ND ND
6 Horie et al. [18] 2000 76 M Rectum NS NS Composite NS Liver ND ND
7 Hamada et al. [19] 2004 65 F Rectum 13 × 8 Surgery Pure Alive 10 mo Lung ND ND
8 Nakayama et al. [20] 2005 63 M Rectum 10 × 8.4 Surgery Pure Alive 12 mo LN ND ND
9 Matsunuma et al. [21] 2005 54 M Ascending 11 × 9.5 Surgery Pure Dead 2 mo None ND ND
10 Yamaguchi et al. [22] 2006 72 F Descending 10 × 8.5 Surgery,CT Composite Dead 1.5 mo Peritoneum, nodes ND ND
11 Kono et al. [5] 2007 66 M Cecum 13 × 13 Surgery Composite Dead 1.5 mo LN ND KRAS WT, MSS
12 Mastoraki et al. [23] 2009 62 F Descending 8 × 10x8 Surgery Pure Dead 4 mo Liver ND RAS family WT
13 Han et al. [24] 2010 23 F Rectum 6 × 5 Surgery,CT,RT Pure Alive 17 mo None ND ND
14 Pancione et al. [25] 2011 71 F Asecnding 10 × 10 Surgery,CT Pure Dead 8 mo Liver, peritoneum, LN ND BRAFV600E
15 Takeshita et al. [26] 2011 75 M Rectum 17 × 10 Surgery,CT Pure Dead 5 mo LN ND ND
16 Remo et al. [27] 2012 73 F Ascending 10 × 4 Surgery,CT Composite Dead 6 mo LN negative BRAF600VE
17 Kobayashi et al. [28] 2012 58 F Ascending 10 × 5 Surgery Composite Dead 4 mo LN positive ND
18 Lee JR et al. [29] 2013 62 M Sigmoid 4 × 4x1 Surgery,CT Composite Alive 36 mo LN ND ND
19 Samalavicius et al. [30] 2013 49 M Rectum 7 Surgery,CT Pure Dead 7 mo LN positive KRAS WT, BRAF600VE
20 Saito et al. [31] 2014 81 M Cecum 8 × 6 Surgery,CT Composite Dead 0.7 mo Liver, LN ND ND
21 Baba et al. [32] 2014 45 F Sigmoid 9 × 8x5 Surgery Composite Dead 1.5 mo Peritoneum, lung, LN ND ND
22 Romera et al. [33] 2014 77 M Descending - Surgery Pure Dead 2 mo None ND ND
23 Agaimy et al. [1] 2014 79 M Cecum 9 × 5x2 Surgery Pure Dead 6 mo LN negative BRAFV600E
24 Cho et al. [12] 2015 73 M Cecum 4 × 3 Surgery Composite Alive 1 mo LN ND KRAS WT, BRAF600E
25 Moussaly et al. [34] 2015 87 F Transverse 12 × 9.5x8.5 Surgery Composite Dead 2 mo None ND ND
26 Kalyan et al. [35] 2015 31 F Cecum 7 Surgery,CT Composite Dead 4 mo LN positive KRAS mutant, BRAF WT
27 D'Amico et al. [36] 2019 65 M Ascending 10 Surgery Pure Alive 48 mo LN negative ND
28 This study 2019 41 M Sigmoid 7 × 6 Surgery,CT Pure Dead 2 mo Liver, peritoneum, LN negative RAS WT, BRAFV600E, MSS

CT chemotherapy, RT radiotherapy, mo month, LN lymph node, NS not specified, ND not done, WT wild type, MSI microsatellite instability, MSS micorosatellite stable

Raf is a kinase that is a member of the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway, and when this pathway is activated, it enhances the cell cycle. In BRAF, which is a member of the RAF family, a missense mutation (V600E) of exon 15 codon 600 activates the downstream signal [37]. About 7% of colorectal cancers have this mutation, and their prognosis are known to be poor [38]. In addition, such BRAF mutant colorectal cancer was reported to be more common in sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI) -high right-sided colon cancers [39]. Regarding undifferentiated colorectal cancer with Rhabdoid features, BRAF V600VE mutation was observed in 6 of 7 reported cases (Table 1). We supposed that there may be some correlation between BRAF mutation and rhabdoid features in colorectal cancers. The elucidation of the molecular mechanism is considered to be an issue for the future. On the other hand, MSI was examined in only 2 cases including our case. Both cases were microsatellite stable, but the number of cases was too small to make any conclusion. Along with the accumulation of cases, elucidation of the correlation between MSI status and the rhabdoid feature is also a future issue.

The colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features reported were divided into 13 and 15 cases of the composite and pure types, respectively. The survival curve for these cases is shown in Fig. 6. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features was 3 months, indicating an extremely poor prognosis. Comparison of the OS of patients with the pure and composite types showed no significant difference (p = 0.123). Although there is a limitation that various clinical stages are included in each type group, it suggests that the presence of rhabdoid features would be responsible for the poor survival [1]. The pure type might simply be a case in which the original cancer lesion could not be found in specimens, because it was too small. Although chemotherapy was administered to 9 patients with metastasis, 8 patients died within 1 year. This suggests that the effect of chemotherapy is limited. It has been reported at the experimental level in vitro and in vivo that gefitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, is effective for treating malignant tumors with rhabdoid features [40]. It is considered that further effective clinical trials for malignant tumors with rhabdoid features is required.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. (a) Overall survival (OS) of all patients with colorectal undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features was 3 months after surgery. The 1-year survival rate was 20.9%. (b) Comparison of patients with the pure and composite types showed no significant difference (p = 0.123)

Conclusion

INI1-negative colorectal undifferentiated carcinomas with rhabdoid features are extremely rare, and they have aggressive histological malignancy and poor survival. Chemotherapy is not effective at present; therefore, future clinical trials is required to improve the survival.

Acknowledgements

All authors have no financial support, including technical assistance and advice, to acknowledge.

Abbreviations

CT

Computed tomography

WBC

White blood cell

CRP

C-reactive protein

CEA

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CA19-9

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

sIL-2R

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor

INI1

Integrate interactor 1

PET

Positron emission tomography

FDG

Fluorodeoxyglucose

5FU/LV

5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin

Authors' contributions

MK wrote the manuscript. MK and HO performed the operation. MK, HO, HM, and EM managed the patient’s perioperative course. RK and MS contributed to the drafting of the pathological findings portion of the manuscript. MT gave final approval of this manuscript. All the authors participated in the report’s design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received in support of this study.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Consent has been obtained in Japanese from the patient to publish clinical data and imaging for the purposes of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Masatsugu Kojima, Email: mkojima@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Toru Miyake, Email: myk@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Tomoyuki Ueki, Email: ueki@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Hiroyuki Ohta, Email: hohta@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Ryoji Kushima, Email: kushima@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Masanori Shiohara, Email: shiohara@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Hiroo Mizuta, Email: mizutah@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Hiroya Iida, Email: hiroya@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Email: tsuyo@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Sachiko Kaida, Email: kaida@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Katsushi Takebayashi, Email: katsushi@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Hiromitsu Maehira, Email: hiro0103@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Yusuke Nishina, Email: yusuke27@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Tomoharu Shimizu, Email: tomoharu@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Eiji Mekata, Email: mekata@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

Masaji Tani, Email: mtani@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.

References

  • 1.Agaimy A, Rau TT, Hartmann A, Stoehr R. SMARCB1 (INI1)-negative rhabdoid carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathologic and molecular study of a highly aggressive variant with literature review. Am J SurgPathol. 2014;38(7):910–920. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang J, Andrici J, Sioson L, Clarkson A, Sheen A, Farzin M, et al. Loss of INI1 expression in colorectal carcinoma is associated with high tumor grade, poor survival, BRAFV600E mutation, and mismatch repair deficiency. Hum Pathol. 2016;55:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beckwith JB, Palmer NF. Histopathology and prognosis of Wilmstumors: results from the First National Wilms' Tumor Study. Cancer. 1978;41(5):1937–1948. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1937::AID-CNCR2820410538>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kohashi K, Oda Y. Oncogenic roles of SMARCB1/INI1 and its deficient tumors. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(4):547–552. doi: 10.1111/cas.13173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kono T, Imai Y, Imura J, Ono Y, Hagiwara S, Taira K, et al. Cecal adenocarcinoma with prominent rhabdoid feature: report of a case with immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analyses. Int J SurgPathol. 2007;15(4):414–420. doi: 10.1177/1066896907302418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Frierson HF, Mills SE, Innes DJ. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of the pelvis. Cancer. 1985;55(9):1963–1967. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9<1963::AID-CNCR2820550922>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kodet R, Newton WA, Sachs N, Hamoudi AB, Raney RB, Asmar L, et al. Rhabdoidtumors of soft tissues: a clinicopathologic study of 26 cases enrolled on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Hum Pathol. 1991;22(7):674–684. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90289-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miyagi J, Tsuhako K, Kinjo T, Iwamasa T, Hashimoto H, Ishikawa S. Rhabdoid tumour of the lung is a dedifferentiated phenotype of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2000;37(1):37–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2000.00906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang W, Xue Y, Zhou S, Kuo A, Cairns BR, Crabtree GR. Diversity and specialization of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Genes Dev. 1996;10(17):2117–2130. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.17.2117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schnitzler G, Sif S, Kingston RE. Human SWI/SNF interconverts a nucleosome between its base state and a stable remodeled state. Cell. 1998;94(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81217-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Biegel JA, Zhou JY, Rorke LB, Stenstrom C, Wainwright LM, Fogelgren B. Germ-line and acquired mutations of INI1 in atypical teratoid and rhabdoidtumors. Cancer Res. 1999;59(1):74–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cho IJ, Kim SS, Min YD, Noh MW, Hong R. Poorly differentiated cecal adenocarcinoma showing prominent rhabdoid feature combined with appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma: a case report and review of the literature. OncolLett. 2015;9(4):1527–1530. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chetty R, Bhathal PS. Caecal adenocarcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Virchows Arch APatholAnatHistopathol. 1993;422(2):179–182. doi: 10.1007/BF01607171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang AH, Chen WY, Chiang H. Malignant rhabdoid tumour of colon. Histopathology. 1994;24(1):89–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macak J, Kodet R. Rectal adenocarcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype. Pathologica. 1995;87(6):696–699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marcus VA, Viloria J, Owen D, Tsao MS. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of the colon. Report of a case with molecular analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(11):1322–1326. doi: 10.1007/BF02055131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nakamura I, Nakano K, Nakayama K, Ishii Y, Ohta K, Takahashi M, et al. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of the colon: report of a case. Surg Today. 1999;29(10):1083–1087. doi: 10.1007/s005950050649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Horie Y, Kato M, Umeki K, Maruyama S. A case of rectal adenocarcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype and neuroendocrine differentiation. J Okayama SurgPathol Assoc. 2000;37(1–2):15–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hamada TSS, Nihira Y, Kobayashi N, Masako M, Sakurai S. A malignant rhabdoidtumor originating from the rectum. J ClinSurg. 2004;59(1):83–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakayama A, Tsujimoto K, Ito N, Takeuchi N, Matsushita M, Takashi E. A case of malignant rhabdoid tumor of the rectum. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2005;38(10):1630–1635. doi: 10.5833/jjgs.38.1630. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matsunuma R, Kashiwabara H, Shuno H, Tochikubo J, Mano Y, Setoguchi T, et al. A case of malignant rhabdoidtumor of the ascending colon. Shizuoka J Med. 2005;19(1):91–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamaguchi R, Fujiki K, Akagi Y, Murakami N, Matsumoto A, Kofuji K, et al. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the colon with prominent rhabdoid features. Jpn J DiagnPathol. 2006;23(2):124–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mastoraki A, Kotsilianou O, Papanikolaou IS, Foukas PG, Sakorafas G, Safioleas M. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of the large intestine. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(11):1357–1358. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0717-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Han SL, Li JL, Liu Z, Cheng J, Guo SC, Wu SL. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of rectum: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14(2):199–200. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0575-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pancione M, Di Blasi A, Sabatino L, Fucci A, Dalena AM, Palombi N, et al. A novel case of rhabdoid colon carcinoma associated with a positive CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAF mutation. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(7):1047–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takeshita M, Kadoya N, Syouji M, Amaya K, Yoshikawa A, Nojima N, et al. A case of giant rectal cancer with rhabdoid feature. Jpn J GastroenterolSurg. 2011;44(2):193–199. doi: 10.5833/jjgs.44.193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Remo A, Zanella C, Molinari E, Talamini A, Tollini F, Piacentini P, et al. Rhabdoid carcinoma of the colon: a distinct entity with a very aggressive behavior: a case report associated with a polyposis coli and review of the literature. Int J SurgPathol. 2012;20(2):185–190. doi: 10.1177/1066896911415405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kobayashi Y, Yokoyama K, Goto T, Tanaka Y, Higashino M, Harada T, et al. Adenocarcinoma with extensive rhabdoid features (composite rhabdoidtumor) of the colon: a case report and review of the literature. Med J Minami Osaka Hosp. 2011;59(1):51–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee SH, Seol H, Kim WY, Lim SD, Kim WS, Hwang TS, et al. Rhabdoid colorectal carcinomas: reports of two cases. Korean J Pathol. 2013;47(4):372–377. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Samalavicius NE, Stulpinas R, Gasilionis V, Baltruskeviciene E, Aleknavicius E, Mickys U. Rhabdoid carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):252–255. doi: 10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saito K, Munemoto Y, Takashima Y, Suzuki H, Iida Y, Mitui T, et al. A case of ascending colon cancer rapid growth and various histological types. J JpnSurgAssoc. 2014;75(7):1933–1937. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baba Y, Uchiyama T, Hamada K, Ishihara Y, Tanaka H, Isono Y, et al. A case report of undifferentiated carcinoma of the sigmoid colon with rhabdoid features. Nihon ShokakibyoGakkaiZasshi. 2014;111(7):1384–1390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Romera Barba E, Sanchez Perez A, Duque Perez C, Garcia Marcilla JA, Vazquez Rojas JL. Malignant rhabdoidtumor of the colon: a case report. Cir Esp. 2014;92(9):638–640. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moussaly E, Atallah JP. A rare case of undifferentiated carcinoma of the colon with rhabdoid features: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:531348. doi: 10.1155/2015/531348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kalyan A, Pasricha G, Monga D, Singhi A, Bahary N. Case report of rhabdoid colon cancer and review of literature. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(1):e5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D'Amico F, Bertacco A, Cesari M, Mescoli C, Caturegli G, Gondolesi G, et al. Extraordinary disease-free survival in a rare malignant extrarenalrhabdoidtumor: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13256-017-1554-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417(6892):949–954. doi: 10.1038/nature00766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanz-Garcia E, Argiles G, Elez E, Tabernero J. BRAF mutant colorectal cancer: prognosis, treatment, and new perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2648–2657. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haydon AM, Jass JR. Emerging pathways in colorectal-cancer development. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(2):83–88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00649-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kuwahara Y, Hosoi H, Osone S, Kita M, Iehara T, Kuroda H, et al. Antitumor activity of gefitinib in malignant rhabdoidtumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(17):5940–5948. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.


Articles from Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES