Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;22(5):706–713. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0682

Table 2. Comparison of Time Consumed by Pooled Cardiothoracic Surgeons during Each Simulation Surgery.

VSD Patch Appliance RVOT Patch Appliance
Time consumed by 6 cardiothoracic surgeons*
 1st simulation 35.9 ± 4.1 51.5 ± 69.5
34.4 (32.5–43.5) 21.4 (17.9–192.3)
 2nd simulation 24.3 ± 6.9 16.8 ± 8.4
25.0 (16.5–31.9) 16.1 (4.2–27.6)
 3rd simulation 20.0 ± 5.5 16.7 ± 8.2
17.3 (16.2–29.5) 13.6 (10.3–30.0)
p values from comparison tests between simulation surgeries
 1st vs. 2nd simulation 0.03 0.06
 2nd vs. 3rd simulation 0.03 1.00
 1st vs. 3rd simulation 0.03 0.01

*Data provided with mean ± SD followed by median (range) minutes of time consumed by six cardiothoracic surgeons, p values calculated from Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t test was used after normality test. RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract, VSD = ventricular septal defect