Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;22(5):735–741. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0865

Table 2. Results of Logistic Regression Analysis for Predicting Fat-Poor AML.

Univariable Analysis Multivariable Analysis
OR P OR P
Sex (female) 6.51 (2.62–16.21) < 0.001 6.46 (1.86–22.40) 0.003
Tumor volume (≤ 5.8 cc) 11.42 (3.32–39.04) < 0.001 6.58 (1.51–28.71) 0.012
Circularity index (≤ 0.9) 76.70 (21.2–277.04) < 0.001 41.02 (6.58–255.25) < 0.001
Radiologic sign for AML* 19.41 (7.63–49.40) < 0.001 1.42 (0.27–7.48) 0.683

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. *Presence of any pattern such as angular interface sign, ice-cream cone sign, or overflowing beer sign. AML = angiomyolipoma, OR = odds ratio