Table 2. Results of Logistic Regression Analysis for Predicting Fat-Poor AML.
| Univariable Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | P | OR | P | |
| Sex (female) | 6.51 (2.62–16.21) | < 0.001 | 6.46 (1.86–22.40) | 0.003 |
| Tumor volume (≤ 5.8 cc) | 11.42 (3.32–39.04) | < 0.001 | 6.58 (1.51–28.71) | 0.012 |
| Circularity index (≤ 0.9) | 76.70 (21.2–277.04) | < 0.001 | 41.02 (6.58–255.25) | < 0.001 |
| Radiologic sign for AML* | 19.41 (7.63–49.40) | < 0.001 | 1.42 (0.27–7.48) | 0.683 |
Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. *Presence of any pattern such as angular interface sign, ice-cream cone sign, or overflowing beer sign. AML = angiomyolipoma, OR = odds ratio