. 2021 Apr 12;4(2):e24579. doi: 10.2196/24579

Table 3.

Comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum partner support between control and intervention groups: intention-to-treat analysis.

Intervention arm				Mean		95% CI	β		SE		P value
BSES-SF^a
	Original^b
		Control	49.5		48.0-51.0		Ref	—^c		—
		FFABC^d	48.7		47.1-50.3		–0.748	1.123		.51
		Milk Man app	50.1		48.4-51.3		0.379	1.081		.73
		Combination	49.5		48.5-51.6		0.589	1.111		.60
	Pooled^e
		Control	47.4		45.0-49.7		Ref	—		—
		FFABC	47.3		44.9-49.6		–0.112	1.677		.95
		Milk Man app	48.3		46.1-50.5		0.919	1.731		.60
		Combination	47.9		46.0-49.8		0.542	1.532		.72
PPSS^f
	Original
		Control	82.8		81.4-84.2		Ref	—		—
		FFABC	82.5		81.0-83.9		–0.317	1.033		.76
		Milk Man app	83.1		81.7-84.4		0.256	0.994		.80
		Combination	81.2		79.8-82.7		1.595	1.026		.12
	Pooled
		Control	81.7		79.2-84.2		Ref	—		—
		FFABC	81.0		78.1-83.9		–0.680	2.023		.74
		Milk Man app	82.8		80.2-85.4		1.146	1.765		.52
		Combination	78.7		75.3-82.0		–2.991	2.161		.17

^aBSES-SF: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form, with scores ranging from 14 to 70 with higher scores indicating higher levels of breastfeeding self-confidence.

^bOriginal analyses included those participants with complete data.

^cNot applicable.

^dFFABC: father-focused antenatal breastfeeding class.

^ePooled analyses that used the imputed datasets.

^fPPSS: Postpartum Partner Support Scale, with scores ranging from 25 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of postpartum partner support.