Table 3.
Relationship between fidelity predictors and the nutritional status of intervention participants
| Fixed Effects | β | 95% Confidence interval | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Adherence | ||||
| Study-specific checklist | ||||
| Reasons for RT | −1.16 | −6.96 | 4.64 | 0.69 |
| Eating as integral to radiotherapy | 0.93 | −4.79 | 6.64 | 0.748 |
| Nutrition plan | 7.62 | 0.65 | 14.58 | 0.032 |
| Review plan | −8.37 | −23.88 | 7.15 | 0.287 |
| Validated nutrition assessment | −2.93 | −10.95 | 5.07 | 0.468 |
| Adequacy of intake | 7.15 | −15.73 | 30.04 | 0.536 |
| Behaviour Change Counselling Index | ||||
| Overall Practitioner Score | 0.69 | 0.02 | 1.38 | 0.045 |
| ‘Spirit’ of intervention delivery | ||||
| CTS-R interpersonal effectiveness score | −1.98 | −7.46 | 3.50 | 0.476 |
| Competence | ||||
| CTS-R application of behaviour change counselling item | 3.50 | 0.47 | 6.53 | 0.024 |