Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;21:276. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02212-y

Table 3.

Comparison of self-reported function and nutrition between HUR and conventional gym training by gender at baseline (n = 80)

HUR Men (n = 20) Conventional Men (n = 16) P-value for difference HUR Women (n = 37) Conventional Women (n = 16) P-value for difference
Self-reported physical activity PASE (score) 139 (84) 129 (36) 0.695 121 (45) 127 (49) 0.645
Self-reported nutrition ARFS (score) 38 (11) 37 (6) 0.760 34 (9) 35 (9) 0.756
AES protein (g) 124.56 (42.23) 103 (19) 0.090 99.28 (34.99) 82 (28) 0.059
AES energy (kJ) 11,409 (2963) 10,429 (2106) 0.359 8773 (2630) 7320 (2731) 0.083

HUR Helsinki University Research, PASE Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, AES Australian Eating Survey, ARFS Australian Recommended Food Score. Analyses are independent sample t-tests for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney tests for non-normally distributed data