Table 3.
Statistical analysis of the LARS score response.a
| Variables/responses | Score range | Consistency, n | IMSMb score high, n | TIc score high, n | Nonparametric test | Consistency check | |||
| Wilcoxon Z value | P value | Kappa value | P value | ||||||
| LARSd score | 0-42 | 7 | 10 | 4 | −1.509 | .13 | 0.760a | <.001a | |
| LARS category | — | 14 | 4 | 3 | −0.264 | .79 | 0.490 | .001 | |
| Q1 | 0-7 | 10 | 9 | 2 | −2.032 | .04 | 0.206 | .12 | |
| Q2 | 0-3 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 2.449 | .01 | 0.523 | <.001 | |
| Q3 | 0-5 | 12 | 0 | 8 | −2.555 | .01 | 0.472 | <.001 | |
| Q4 | 0-11 | 15 | 4 | 2 | −0.638 | .52 | 0.543 | <.001 | |
| Q5 | 0-16 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 0.001 | >.99 | 0.786 | <.001 | |
aBecause LARS score is a continuous variable, the Pearson coefficient and corresponding P value are calculated here.
bIMSM: instant messaging/social media.
cTI: telephone interview.
dLARS: low anterior resection syndrome.