. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Nov 4;72(12):2017–2024. doi: 10.1002/art.41440

Table 3:

Odds ratios for good EULAR response by TS and CPM central dysregulation group

TS and CPM Central Dysregulation Group
	Low TS and low CPM dysregulation	Predominantly TS dysregulation	Predominantly CPM dysregulation	High TS and high CPM dysregulation
	Reference	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	p-value (trend)
Unadjusted	1.00	0.48 (0.16, 1.45)	0.29 (0.09, 0.96)	0.25 (0.09, 0.71)	0.0072
Adjusted¹	1.00	0.49 (0.14, 1.67)	0.31 (0.08, 1.13)	0.23 (0.07, 0.73)	0.0077

Abbreviations: EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism, QST: Quantitative sensory testing, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, PPT: Pressure pain detection threshold, TS: Temporal summation, CPM: Conditioned pain modulation

^1.

Adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, education, seropositivity, disease duration, PROMIS sleep disturbance, PROMIS depression, and modified Charlson comorbidity score.

Bolded values are statistically significant