Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018 Aug;16(4):423–433. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0454-8

Table 1.

Summary of mechanical characterization techniques with outcome variables based on length scale and type of specimen

Length scale Type of specimen Mechanical testing mode Outcome variables
Whole bone Long bones, vertebra Bending, tension, compression, torsion, compression Extrinsic mechanical properties, i.e., structural stiffness, max load, work to fracture, fracture load
Tissue Cortical beam, dumbbell, dog bone, single-edged notched specimen (SEB), cancellous cores Tension, compression, torsion, bending fatigue, compression (static or cyclic) Intrinsic mechanical properties, i.e., Young’s modulus, yield, fatigue and ultimate strength, fracture toughness
Micro Cortical bone cubes up to 5 mm thick, cortical or trabecular bone slices Microscratch, microindentation, reference point indentation Material level properties i.e. fracture toughness, hardness, modulus (elastic and reduced), elastic work, total work, total indentation distance, indentation distance increase
Nano Cortical or trabecular bone specimen 2–3 mm thick, cortical or trabecular bone slices Nanoindentation, in situ testing (tension, compression, bending) Material level properties, i.e., hardness, modulus, fibril strain, mineral stress