Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;2020(11):CD013787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013787

Liu 2020.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling No sampling method reported, other than these were patients with COVID‐19 in the Renmin Hospital in Wuhan from 31 January‐26 February 2020
Patient characteristics and setting Setting: hospital
Site: Renmin Hopsital of Wuhan University
Country: China
Symptoms and severity:
Demographics: cases: 55 male and 57 female; controls: 23 male and 22 female
Age: adults; mean age cases subgroups 62‐63 and cases 62 years
Exposure history: not stated
Time since onset of symptoms: not stated
Any other info:
Index tests Urine samples, collected from catheters. All collected specimens were tested within 2 h; no blinding reported; no timing reported, no thresholds reported
Target condition and reference standard(s) Diagnosis and Treatment Program of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (sixth trial version); no further information on reference standard
Flow and timing No information reported
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   High risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (All tests)
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias?   Unclear risk  
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question?     High
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? No    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   High risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Unclear    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Unclear    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Unclear risk