Domain |
Signalling Questions |
Yes |
No |
Can't tell / not reported / not applicable |
Quote or reason for judgement |
Selection bias |
1. Was the selection of participants either consecutive, or randomly selected from the population? |
|
|
|
|
2a. Were the eligibility criteria clearly described? |
|
|
|
|
2b. If yes, were the eligibility criteria similar to the other studies in the review that had a control group? |
|
|
|
|
Lead time bias / immortal time bias |
3. Was the time between starting follow‐up for outcomes (recruitment) and starting the intervention of an appropriately short duration? |
|
|
|
|
4. Was it similar to other studies in the review that had a control group? |
|
|
|
|
Confounding by indication |
5. Are those in the study at a similar stage/severity of their disease and have similar prognostic factors to other studies in the review that had a control group? |
|
|
|
|
Misclassification bias / information bias |
6. Was dose (or other details) of intervention, both planned and given, clearly described? |
|
|
|
|
7. Was measurement of outcome made by a reliable and valid method (e.g. objective measure)? |
|
|
|
|
Bias from natural recovery / regression to the mean |
8. Were outcome variables measured pre‐intervention (i.e. interrupted time series design with multiple measurements, of before‐after design)? |
|
|
|
|
Bias due to adjunctive therapies |
9. Is there adequate reporting of adjunctive therapies both before and during the study period? |
|
|
|
|
Attrition bias |
See Cochrane RoB tool |
|
Selective reporting of outcomes |
See Cochrane RoB tool |
|