Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD004409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004409.pub2

Hyde 1987.

Methods Allocation: randomised ‐ by tossing a coin, matched on their potential for rehabilitation, duration ill, diagnosis, psychological impairment, remedial problems. 
 Blindness: open*. 
 Duration: 2 years.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (14 out of 22), remainder epilepsy, organic mental states, manic‐depressive illness (criteria not reported). 
 N=22. 
 Age: mean ˜ 42 years, range 16‐65 years. 
 Sex: 12 M, 10 F. 
 History: already in standard care hospital >6 months.
Interventions 1. Hostel ward: 24 hour care satellite ward distant from main hospital. N=11. 
 2. Standard care: District General Hospital psychiatric ward admission. N=11.
Outcomes Unable to continue with placement.
Unable to use: 
 Global impression: PIRS (no SD). 
 Mental state: Krawiecka, PSE (no numerical data). 
 Service use: (no numeric data). 
 Social functioning: Social Facilities Checklist (no numerical data), use of time (no SD). 
 Behaviour: Remedial Problem Behaviour Scale (no data). 
 Satisfaction: patient attitudes scales (no data for experimental group). 
 Cognitive function: MMS (no data). 
 Economic data: costs (no SD).
Notes *ratings of Social Facilities Checklist ‐ blinded raters, all other outcomes were not blinded.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Randomised, toss of a coin. Even numbers in each group.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk No details.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Open study design.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear.
Free of selective reporting? High risk Many outcomes were either not reported, or were rendered unusable due to missing standard deviations or N values.
Free of other bias? Unclear risk Unclear.

MMS ‐ Mini Mental State 
 PIRS ‐ Psychological Impairment Rating Scale 
 PSE ‐ Present State Examination