| Study | Reason for exclusion |
|---|---|
| Burgoyne 1983 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: severe mental illness. Intervention: telephone prompt vs. no prompt, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Cramer 1999 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: less than 50% with schizophrenia. Intervention: compliance support via visual feedback, both groups had electronic device. |
| Crespo‐Iglesias 2006 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: all people with psychiatry appointment. Intervention: telephone call vs. assume no telephone call, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Frangou 2005 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: schizophrenia. Intervention: e‐monitoring (medication dispenser transmitting to research team) vs. pill counting vs. usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Hansson 2008 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. Intervention: DIALOG (computer‐mediated structuring patient‐key worker communicating to patient satisfaction with 8 life domains) vs usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Kluger 1983 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: psychiatric outpatients. Intervention: telephone prompt vs. orientation statement + prompt vs. orientation statement vs. usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Lassen 2011 | Allocation: quasi‐randomised. Participants: schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. Intervention: acceptance and commitment therapy or treatment as usual + treatment as usual, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| MacDonald 2000a | Allocation: not randomised. Participants: psychiatric outpatients. Intervention: telephone prompting vs. usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT‐based prompt. |
| Montes 2009 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: schizophrenia. Intervention: telephone call vs. usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT prompt. |
| Nietert 2009 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: people with mixed serious medical diagnoses, 1 % psychosis. Intervention: system to prompt pharmacist to prompt clinicians via telephone vs. facsimile vs. usual care, not semi‐automatic ICT prompt. |
| Pijnenborg 2010 | Allocation: quasi‐randomised, not randomised. Participants: schizophrenia or related disorders. Intervention: SMS‐message semi‐automated goal directed prompts vs. delay instigation waiting list control full stop. |
| Rossi 1994 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: severe mental illness. Intervention: telephone prompt vs. assignment only vs. assignment with written prompt vs. control, not semi‐automatic ICT prompt. |
| Tidey 2011 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: schizophrenia. Intervention: contingency management vs. non‐contingent reinforcement, not semi‐automatic ICT prompt. |
| Velligan 2008 | Allocation: randomised. Participants: schizophrenia outpatients. Intervention: full‐CAT vs. pharm‐CAT vs. treatment as usual, not (ONLY) semi‐automatic ICT prompt. |
CAT ‐ cognitive adaption training DIALOG ‐ computer‐mediated structuring patient‐key worker communicating tool full‐CAT ‐ cognitive adaption training to improve multiple areas of adaptive functioning ICT ‐ information and communication technology pharm‐CAT ‐ cognitive adaption training for medication adherence SMS ‐ short message service vs ‐ versus