Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 5;2016(7):CD003839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003839.pub3

Azarnoush 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Single‐centre, randomised, parallel‐group controlled trial.
Participants 206 adult patients who had undergone valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis, with or without myocardial revascularisation.
Interventions Self‐monitoring vs standard monitoring
Randomised to standard monitoring of INR at a laboratory including at least one monthly assay at a medical analysis laboratory (n = 103), or self‐testing using either the CoaguChek® system (n = 55) or the INRatio® system (n = 48). Self‐testing was performed weekly, and in addition once monthly INR measurements were carried out at the laboratory on the same day as the self‐measurement. Only the results of the monthly tests for each group were compared. Education relating to VKA therapy was provided, the same to all participants in all allocation groups. The target INR and target range were determined for each participant on the basis of the type of surgery, and according to their risk factors for thromboembolic disease (target ranges were between 2 and 3.5 INR). Aspirin was prescribed to some participants according to risk factors.
Outcomes Mean time within target range. Clinical adverse events, and serious bleeding.
Trial identification Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00925197
Study duration 49.0 ± 10.3 weeks
Oral anticoagulant used Not reported
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation stated to have been done but no methods reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Possibly adequate or not used.
Intention to treat analysis High risk ITT not performed.
Reporting of losses of follow‐up Low risk 7% of participants were lost to follow‐up.
Blinding Unclear risk Blinding not reported.