Beyth 2000.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. | |
Participants | 325 hospitalised patients aged 65+ years (mean age 75 years) commencing warfarin therapy of at least 10 days duration. The study was based in several university hospitals (Cleveland, Ohio, USA). Exclusions included: warfarin therapy within previous 6 months; admission from nursing home; too ill to give informed consent. |
|
Interventions |
Self‐monitoring vs usual care The intervention group (n = 163) used home self‐testing using Coumatrak Protime Test System® to self‐monitor prothrombin time. 1‐hour education session, patients phoned results to coach who made recommendations on dosage adjustment. The conventional management group (n = 162) received medical care including management, dosing and medical information managed by primary care physician as per usual care. Randomisation was stratified according to baseline risk for major bleeding. |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: first major bleeding event during the 6‐month intervention period. Secondary outcomes: death; recurrent venous thromboembolism at 6 months; major bleeding after 6 months; percentage time INR within target range. |
|
Trial identification | ||
Study duration | 6 months | |
Oral anticoagulant used | Warfarin | |
Notes | One‐to‐one training, lasting 30‐60 minutes. Participants instructed to check prothrombin 3 times in the first week after hospital discharge and weekly in the first month, and monthly thereafter depending on the results. 100% up at 6 months. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation stated to have been done but no method reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Clearly adequate concealment. |
Intention to treat analysis | Low risk | ITT analysis was performed. |
Reporting of losses of follow‐up | Unclear risk | < 20% losses to follow‐up. |
Blinding | Low risk | Blinded data collectors. |