TABLE 2.
Grading Rubric
Skill | Poor | Good | Excellent |
---|---|---|---|
Tone/cadence | Not all words are legible, tone is rushed | Speech is clear, tone is calm | Speech easy to hear and all words are legible, tone is calm and reassuring |
Rhythm/pace | Speaks at a normal pace without awareness that sedated patients may need longer time to process speech | Speaks at a slower pace than normal | Speaks at a slower pace than normal. Pauses in between sentences |
Rapport management | Does not observe patient’s response if any, does not address patient by name | Manages rapport building: e.g., by Using patient’s name in communication | Handles rapport formation, maintenance and termination well. E.g., by uses patient’s name in communication. Uses “we” language, introduces colleagues |
Active involvement, providing sense of control | Speaks to patient as passive recipients of treatment | Speaks patient (including sedated or comatose patients) as active recipients | Emphasizes that patient is a key part of the treatment team. Explains what patient can do to help the team and what patient can do during a procedure to make sure it goes smoothly if applicable. Provides choices whenever is possible |
Positive (but realistic) language | States “you are safe” without additional explanations | Uses suggestions of safety such as “catheter is increasing the safety and comfort”; some suggestions are formulated well | Uses situation-specific suggestions of safety and expands them to the treatment team; well-formulated suggestions |
Future orientation | Forgets to discuss temporary nature of things that cause discomfort in the ICU. Does not discuss future goals | Emphasizes that endotracheal tube/other limitations are temporary | Emphasizes that endotracheal tube/other limitations are temporary, explaining their role from the perspective of treatment/future recovery. Provides patient with suggestions on recovery, talks to the patient about the day when they would recover and do something they really look forward to doing |
Suggestive techniques | Does not apply suggestive techniques. The text is purely informative, based on “dominant mode of consciousness” | Applies some techniques, but mostly for the sake of implying the technique. The focus is not on the “message” but the technical elements of the communication | Applies flexibly many techniques (yes-set, metaphors, reframing, implication, illusion of alternatives, modeling, etc.). The communication is flexibly moves on the continuum of “dominant-alternative” modes of consciousness |
Does not recognize the negative suggestion in the communication | |||
Reframing conditions | Forgets to discuss the reason for ICU admission. Forgets to reframe essential aspects of care (endotracheal tube, machine noises, etc.). Does not preframe upcoming procedures | Discusses reason for ICU admission. Reframes some not all aspects of care and sounds. Preframes upcoming procedures | Discusses reason for ICU admission. Reframes basic facts, procedures, lines, medications. Lists multiple sounds when reframing ICU environment; links sounds to the care team and suggestions of safety. Preframes upcoming procedures including the reason why they are important |
Touch | Does not warn the patient or ask permission before touching them | Provides touch once rapport has been established but does not inform the patient | Provides touch once rapport has been established and informs the patient that she would touch their hand if ok. Uses touch appropriately for rapport maintenance |
Communication patterns | Introduces self by name, does not use phrases that would be used in a normal conversation such as “thank you,” ”good morning,” and so on | Introduces self by name, occasionally uses routine phrases that would be used in a normal conversation such as “thank you,” ”good morning,” and so on | Introduces self by name and function, routinely says ”good morning,” “thank you,” “please,” and “good bye” even when patient is sedated |
Self-reflection | Does not reflect on the impact of the process on herself | Briefly reflects on the interaction | Regularly and appropriately reflects on the emotional aspect of the process (“detached concern”). Manages evoked emotions well. Asks for supervision if necessary |
Overall impression | Not yet advised to communicate with the critically ill | Ok to interact with patient while being aware of the areas that need improvement | Ready to interact with the critically ill, speaking from the heart and not just repeating a model text |