Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;3(4):e0403. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000403

TABLE 2.

Grading Rubric

Skill Poor Good Excellent
Tone/cadence Not all words are legible, tone is rushed Speech is clear, tone is calm Speech easy to hear and all words are legible, tone is calm and reassuring
Rhythm/pace Speaks at a normal pace without awareness that sedated patients may need longer time to process speech Speaks at a slower pace than normal Speaks at a slower pace than normal. Pauses in between sentences
Rapport management Does not observe patient’s response if any, does not address patient by name Manages rapport building: e.g., by Using patient’s name in communication Handles rapport formation, maintenance and termination well. E.g., by uses patient’s name in communication. Uses “we” language, introduces colleagues
Active involvement, providing sense of control Speaks to patient as passive recipients of treatment Speaks patient (including sedated or comatose patients) as active recipients Emphasizes that patient is a key part of the treatment team. Explains what patient can do to help the team and what patient can do during a procedure to make sure it goes smoothly if applicable. Provides choices whenever is possible
Positive (but realistic) language States “you are safe” without additional explanations Uses suggestions of safety such as “catheter is increasing the safety and comfort”; some suggestions are formulated well Uses situation-specific suggestions of safety and expands them to the treatment team; well-formulated suggestions
Future orientation Forgets to discuss temporary nature of things that cause discomfort in the ICU. Does not discuss future goals Emphasizes that endotracheal tube/other limitations are temporary Emphasizes that endotracheal tube/other limitations are temporary, explaining their role from the perspective of treatment/future recovery. Provides patient with suggestions on recovery, talks to the patient about the day when they would recover and do something they really look forward to doing
Suggestive techniques Does not apply suggestive techniques. The text is purely informative, based on “dominant mode of consciousness” Applies some techniques, but mostly for the sake of implying the technique. The focus is not on the “message” but the technical elements of the communication Applies flexibly many techniques (yes-set, metaphors, reframing, implication, illusion of alternatives, modeling, etc.). The communication is flexibly moves on the continuum of “dominant-alternative” modes of consciousness
Does not recognize the negative suggestion in the communication
Reframing conditions Forgets to discuss the reason for ICU admission. Forgets to reframe essential aspects of care (endotracheal tube, machine noises, etc.). Does not preframe upcoming procedures Discusses reason for ICU admission. Reframes some not all aspects of care and sounds. Preframes upcoming procedures Discusses reason for ICU admission. Reframes basic facts, procedures, lines, medications. Lists multiple sounds when reframing ICU environment; links sounds to the care team and suggestions of safety. Preframes upcoming procedures including the reason why they are important
Touch Does not warn the patient or ask permission before touching them Provides touch once rapport has been established but does not inform the patient Provides touch once rapport has been established and informs the patient that she would touch their hand if ok. Uses touch appropriately for rapport maintenance
Communication patterns Introduces self by name, does not use phrases that would be used in a normal conversation such as “thank you,” ”good morning,” and so on Introduces self by name, occasionally uses routine phrases that would be used in a normal conversation such as “thank you,” ”good morning,” and so on Introduces self by name and function, routinely says ”good morning,” “thank you,” “please,” and “good bye” even when patient is sedated
Self-reflection Does not reflect on the impact of the process on herself Briefly reflects on the interaction Regularly and appropriately reflects on the emotional aspect of the process (“detached concern”). Manages evoked emotions well. Asks for supervision if necessary
Overall impression Not yet advised to communicate with the critically ill Ok to interact with patient while being aware of the areas that need improvement Ready to interact with the critically ill, speaking from the heart and not just repeating a model text