Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD005038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005038.pub3

Liu C 2001 0 to 2 months.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial.
Setting: China, community (specialised massage clinic and at home).
Participants Sample sizes: n = 232; intervention n = 159; control n = 73.
Ages: not stated, 0‐2 months.
Gender: not stated.
Interventions Massage 2 ‐3 times daily for 15 mins for at least 3 months (medium‐term duration of intervention).  Massage method by Johnson and Johnson. Carried out by parents who were first trained by doctors at a specialist massage centre. Telephone support and contact from doctors in first month.
As touch group but without massage – treatment as usual.
Massage provider: mothers trained by researchers.
Outcomes Primary outcome data (Means and SDs): Bayley MDI mental development index, Bayley PDI psychological development index, sleep habits (good, not good, medium), growth (height, weight head circumference, chest circumference) statistical significance only using T and p. Illness (URTI, diarrhoea, anaemia).
Timing: outcomes assessed at baseline and at 6 months from start of intervention.
Notes Funder: not stated.
If the babies developed anaemia during the studies they were treated with oral iron supplementations until the Hb levels reached normal and then for one month after.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Described in abstract of study as “randomly divided”, but no details given.
Comment: judged as high risk, no further details available from trial investigator.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No apparent attempt to conceal allocation, no details given
Comment: judged as high risk, no further details available from trial investigator.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No dropouts reported. Dropouts or losses to follow‐up not addressed in the study report.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded, not possible due to nature of intervention.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding of outcome assessors.