Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;2021(3):CD012553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012553.pub2

Chamberlain 1991.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling Twin pregnancies with last US performed within 7–14 days of delivery
Patient characteristics and setting 85 twin pregnancies (enrolled from January 1985 to December 1988); GA at delivery: 36.9 weeks; hospital
Index tests EFW using either AC alone or AC and FL
Target condition and reference standard(s) Birth weight discordance
Flow and timing Excluded women had an interval between US and delivery > 14 days, intrauterine death, BW was not within 6 hours of delivery or EFW was unable to be determined
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   Unclear risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (All tests)
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Low risk