Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3

Scarpignato 1982.

Methods RCT; 3 parallel groups.
Unit of randomization: individual.
Participants Dates of data collection: November 1981 to March 1982.
Setting: University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Inclusion criteria: women undergoing emergency CS (58/60 women in spontaneous labor; classified as non‐elective). N = 60.
Exclusion criteria: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins; severe renal disease, history of pelvic infections.
Interventions Intervention: 2nd generation cephalosporin:
  • cefuroxime 750 mg IM 30‐60 minutes before surgery and 8 and 16 hrs after (short term);

  • N = 20.


Intervention: cephalosporin (B2):
  • cefuroxime 750 mg 3 times a day for 5 days (1st dose being given post‐operatively after the woman had returned to the ward) (long term);

  • N = 20.


Comparison: no treatment:
  • no treatment;

  • N = 20.


The results of both treatment groups have been combined.
Outcomes Fever (> 100.3oF twice 6 hrs apart); endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness); maternal stay (treatment 7.1 vs control 7.9 days, no variance given).
Notes Note: the group given long‐term prophylaxis received the 1st dose after return to the ward.
Class of antibiotic: 2nd generation cephalosporin.
Subgroups:
  • non‐elective CS;

  • timing of administration not specified.


The 3 groups were comparable.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Randomly assigned".
Comment: no description of sequence generation process.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no information was provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no losses to follow‐up reported. 1 woman was excluded because of an allergic reaction to cefuroxime. Could not be re‐included in ITT analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to judge.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: no blinding, not placebo‐controlled.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: probably outcome assessment was not blinded.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other sources of bias identified.