Mehinovic 2018.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient Sampling | 50 patients with liver cirrhosis and 50 patients with HCC were included in this study. Age range: 29‐81. Males 57% |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | |||
Index tests | Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay ARCHITECT AFP assay (CMIA, Ireland) was used for AFP detection; no prespecified cut‐off value. | ||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Unclear: ECHO and computerised tomography (CT) were used to detect and measure the size of HCCs. | ||
Flow and timing | No information on interval between index test and reference standard | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | "Funding: This research did not receive any financial support. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist." | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? | High risk | ||
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question? | High | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (AFP) | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | No | ||
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? | High risk | ||
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question? | Low concern | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (US+AFP) | |||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (US) | |||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Unclear | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? | Unclear risk | ||
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question? | Unclear | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | No | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Could the patient flow have introduced bias? | High risk |