Table 3.
Results of binomial logistic regression model predicting cinnamon challenge participation.
| Predictora | B (SE) | Δχ2 (df) | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Constant (Intercept) | −0.68 (0.29) | N/Ab | N/A |
| Age groupc | 0.12 (0.35) | 0.1 (1) | 1.12 (0.57-2.26) |
| Experiential attitude | −0.31 (0.16) | 4.0 (1) | 0.73 (0.53-1.00) |
| Instrumental attitude | 0.42 (0.13) | 11.5 (1)** | 1.52 (1.19-1.96) |
| Injunctive norm | 1.15 (0.24) | 30.4 (1)** | 3.15 (2.04-5.15) |
| Descriptive norm | 0.57 (0.23) | 6.6 (1)* | 1.78 (1.15-2.80) |
| Perceived control | 0.53 (0.28) | 3.9 (1) | 1.71 (1.00-3.00) |
| Self-efficacy | 0.25 (0.19) | 1.7 (1) | 1.30 (0.89-1.87) |
| Experiential attitude × value of experiential attitude | −0.09 (0.12) | 0.7 (1) | 0.91 (0.72-1.14) |
| Instrumental attitude × value of instrumental attitude | 0.10 (0.07) | 2.4 (1) | 1.11 (0.97-1.27) |
| Injunctive norm × motivation to comply | −0.48 (0.16) | 8.8 (1)** | 0.62 (0.45-0.85) |
| Descriptive norm × motivation to comply | −0.12 (0.15) | 0.7 (1) | 0.88 (0.64-1.17) |
aModel χ211=151.05; n=318; R2L=0.34; null −2 Log likelihood=440.63; model 2 Log likelihood with predictors=289.58.
bN/A: not applicable.
cAge group was a dummy variable where 0=under 18 years old and 1=from 18 to 35 years old.
*P<.01; **P<.001.