Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 13;12:637582. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.637582

TABLE 3.

Results of the in vivo assays of the biocontrol activity of bacterial endophytes against the tomato bacterial pathogens Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) and Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. perforans (Xep).

Cmm
Xep
Bacterial strains DI 30 dpia AUDPC % of dead plants n. spot/cm2 leaf areab % reductionc
Pseudomonas plecoglossicida _171 4.71cd 51.78d 84.70% 4.02bc 43.506.96
P. plecoglossicida _172 4.00abc 35.29abc 57.14% 1.46a 79.501.79
Pseudomonas citronellolis_f1 2.28a 15.86a 0.00% 4.88c 31.4014.76
Pseudomonas monteilii_f53 4.14abc 40.43abc 57.14% 2.99abc 57.911.14
P. plecoglossicida_f56 4.71cd 33.00abc 84.70% 4.88c 31.3112.39
Bacillus velezensis _261 3.28abc 24.86abc 14.30% 2.00ab 71.834.40
B. velezensis_263 5.00c 47.64bc 100% 2.16ab 69.616.53
B. velezensis _265 2.71ab 30.35abc 14.30% 1.30a 81.703.20
Bacillus megaterium_268 3.00abc 22.71ab 28.57% 2.70ab 61.965.67
B. velezensis _306 3.00abc 32.93abc 14.30% 2.06ab 70.976.82
Positive control 4.71cd 36.92abc 71.42% 7.11d /

aDI 30 dpi: disease index based on a 0–5-point disease scale 30 days post-inoculation. bDisease severity recorded as number of spot/cm2 leaf area assessed 10 days post–Xep inoculation. cPercentage reduction in lesion numbers per unit leaf area compared to the pathogen-only control ± standard error. Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Student–Newman–Keuls test at p ≤ 0.05. AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve. http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/.