Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 27;8(7):e524–e533. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00105-8

Table 2.

Recommendations on thromboprophylaxis in international guidelines

Outpatient In hospital Intensive care unit Post-discharge
National Institutes of Health (February, 2021)58 Not advised unless clear (other) indication Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis; no routine antiplatelet therapy Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis; no routine antiplatelet therapy Extended thromboprophylaxis considered in patients at low risk for bleeding and high risk for venous thromboembolism, as per protocol for patients without COVID-19
International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (May, 2020)51, 52 Not mentioned Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis in the absence of contraindications Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis; increased dose considered in high-risk patients No routine prophylaxis; anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants) considered in high-risk patients* with low risk of bleeding
Anticoagulation forum interim clinical guidance (July, 2020)53 Not mentioned Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis in the absence of contraindications Increased intensity thromboprophylaxis No routine prophylaxis; anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis considered in high-risk patients with low risk of bleeding
The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guideline and expert panel report (June, 2020)59 Not mentioned Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis in the absence of contraindications Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis No routine prophylaxis; anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis considered in high-risk patients with low risk of bleeding
International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (August, 2020)54 All patients should be evaluated regularly, D-dimers should be measured and if >1500 ng/mL, low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis should be considered Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis; increased intensity thromboprophylaxis should be considered in patients with additional risk factors Increased intensity thromboprophylaxis should be considered Thromboprophylaxis is reasonable in patients with persistent immobility, high inflammatory activity or additional risk-factors, or both
American Society of Hematology guidelines (February, 2021)60 Not mentioned Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis in the absence of contraindications Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis; increased intensity thromboprophylaxis considered in high-risk patients with low bleeding risk Not mentioned
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (November, 2020)61 Assess the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding; consider pharmacological prophylaxis if the risk of venous thromboembolism outweighs the risk of bleeding Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis in the absence of contraindications Increased intensity thromboprophylaxis should be considered Assess the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding; consider pharmacological prophylaxis if the risk of venous thromboembolism outweighs the risk of bleeding
WHO guidance (January, 2021)62 No routine thromboprophylaxis Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis Routine dosed thromboprophylaxis No routine thromboprophylaxis
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline (March, 2021)55 Not mentioned Therapeutic dose thromboprophylaxis should be considered unless contraindications Increased intensity thromboprophylaxis should be considered Not mentioned

Potential agents for thromboprophylaxis in an in-hospital setting include low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin; intermediate dosing is commonly interpreted as twice the standard thromboprophylaxis dose.

*

Includes advanced age, stay in the ICU, cancer, previous history of venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, severe immobility, an elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper normal limit).

Body-mass index of more than 30 kg/m2, history of venous thromboembolism, known thrombophilia, active cancer, or rapidly increasing D-dimer concentrations.