Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;27(6):797–806. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0053

Table 5.

Comparison of patients with and without pericardial effusion after cardiac device implantation — procedure-related variables.

Variable With pericardial effusion (n = 8) Without pericardial effusion (n = 102) P
Cardiac device type
DDD 63%; 5/8 53%; 54/102 0.72
VVI 25%; 2/8 26%; 26/102 1.00
ICD 13%; 1/8 20%; 20/102 1.00
CRT 0%; 0/8 2.0%; 2/102 1.00
Number of leads
1 25%; 2/8 42%; 42/102 0.47
2 75%; 6/8 57%; 58/102 0.46
3 0%; 0/8 2.0%; 2/102 1.00
Type/localization of lead
Atrial 75%; 6/8 59%; 60/102 0.47
Ventricular for stimulation 88%; 7/8 78%; 80/102 0.70
Ventricular for defibrillation 13%; 1/8 22%; 22/102 0.70
Manufacturer
Biotronik 63%; 5/8 52%; 53/102 0.70
Medtronic 13%; 1/8 34%; 35/102 0.27
St. Jude Medical 25%; 2/8 14%; 14/102 0.35
Operator 0.52
Operator no. 1 0%; 0/13* 100%; 13/13*
Operator no. 2 0%; 0/11* 100%; 11/11*
Operator no. 3 11%; 3/27* 89%; 24/27*
Operator no. 4 17%; 1/6* 83%; 5/6*
Operator no. 5 7.5%; 4/53* 93%; 49/53*
*

Refers to the number of procedures performed by the given operator;

DDD — dual-chamber pacemaker; CRT — cardiac resynchronization therapy; ICD — implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VVI — ventricular single-chamber pacemaker