TABLE 2.
Risk of bias assessment for selected studies.
| Dion et al. (2004) | Awaisu et al. (2012) | Kittikraisak et al. (2012) | Kastien-Hilka et al. (2017) | Saleem et al. (2018) | Zarova et al. (2018) | Shedrawy et al. (2019) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized study (RoBANS) | ||||||||
| Selection of participants | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Confounding variables | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | |
| Intervention measurement | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Blinding of outcome assessment | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | |
| Incomplete outcome data | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Selective outcome reporting | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Newcastle-ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) | ||||||||
| Selection | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA |
| Selection of the non-exposed cohort | - | - | - | - | - | NA | NA | |
| Ascertainment of exposure | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA | |
| Outcome of interest was not present at start of study | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA | |
| Comparability | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA |
| Exposure | Assessment of outcome | - | - | - | - | - | NA | NA |
| Enough follow-up for outcomes to occur | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA | |
| Non-response rate | * | * | * | * | * | NA | NA | |
| NOS Score | Total stars (max 9) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | NA | NA |