Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD004435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004435.pub3

Fleetham 1998.

Methods Randomised, prospective, unblinded parallel group study comparing oral appliance with nasal CPAP. Study duration 3 months
Participants 101 patients were recruited. Inclusion criteria AHI>10. 51 participants were randomised to receive CPAP and 50 were randomised to receive OA therapy. 96 men were recruited.
Baseline demographics: AHI: CPAP: 37.6 +/‐22.8; OA: 38.7 +/‐22.2. Min SaO2: CPAP: 75.8 +/‐12.7; OA: 73.6 +/‐11.8. Age: CPAP: 49.0 +/‐9.4; OA: 46.2 +/‐11.3. ESS: CPAP: 12.8+/‐4.1; OA: 11.1 +/‐4.9. BMI: CPAP: 32.0 +/‐5.5; OA: 31.4 +/‐5.7. SAQLI: CPAP: 4.2 +/‐1.1; OA: 4.2 +/‐1.0.
Interventions Participants were randomised to either oral appliance or nCPAP for a period of three months.
Outcomes AHI, Epworth sleepiness score, minimum SaO2, Quality of life index.
Notes Jadad score 1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Described as randomised, other information not available
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk OA and CPAP compared