Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Periodontol. 2021 Feb 13;92(3):348–358. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0441

TABLE 2.

Uni- and multivariable analysis of periodontal activity versus MACE

Model Predictor Model Covariablesa Model outcome
MACE
Standardized HR (95% CI) P
Inflammation of the periodontium (PDinflammation) a None 2.25 (1.47 to 3.44) <0.001
Age and sex 1.94 (1.31 to 2.87) 0.001
Framingham Risk Scoreb 1.79 (1.16 to 2.75) 0.008
Age, sex, smoking, HTN, and DM 1.93 (1.31 to 2.84) 0.001
Statin use 2.09 (1.36 to 3.23) 0.001
CAC 2.19 (1.41 to 3.39) <0.001
Periodontal bone lossc 3.16 (1.60 to 6.22) 0.001
Arterial inflammationd 1.80 (1.12 to 2.89) 0.016

Continuous variables were standardized; a backward (conditional) model was used when more than one covariable was entered into the model.

a

The predictor, Inflammation of the periodontium, was entered as a continuous variable.

b

Framingham Risk Score data for these sub-analyses are available in 106 individuals.

c

Periodontal bone loss was evaluated on a five-point scale; the analysis excluded individuals who were edentulous.

d

Arterial Inflammation is measured as target-to-background on positron emission tomography.

DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, arterial hypertension; CAC, coronary artery calcium; HR, hazard ratio, CI, confidence interval.