Table 3.
PLUM regression predicting three levels of alcohol use.
| 95% confidence interval | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | Lower | Upper | Sig. | ||
| Threshold | Drinks = 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.54 | < 0.001 |
| Drinks = 1.00 | 11.25 | 7.10 | 17.64 | < 0.001 | |
| Predictors | Money boy | 1.39 | 0.88 | 2.20 | 0.16 |
| Referent | - | - | - | - | |
| Hu-kuo = Shanghai | 0.76 | 0.42 | 1.36 | 0.35 | |
| Referent | - | - | - | - | |
| Sexual attitudes | 0.84 | 0.63 | 1.13 | 0.24 | |
| Social provisions | 1.46 | 1.09 | 1.93 | < 0.01 | |
| Sex risk | 1.49 | 1.13 | 1.97 | < 0.01 | |
| MB × sexual attitudes | 0.76 | 0.50 | 1.16 | 0.21 | |
| Referent | - | - | - | - | |
| MB × social provisions | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.84 | < 0.01 | |
| Referent | - | - | - | - | |
| MB × sex risk | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.38 | 0.65 | |
| Referent | - | - | - | - | |
Note: MB, money boy.