Table 4.
Classification results measured using F1, showing the effect of choice of type 2 diabetes-negatives, Norm-0 (no physical activity impairment) versus Norm-2 (severe physical activity impairment). The values in the cells represent F1 scores.
| Predictive model and T2Da status | High-level activity bout features | Sociodemographic and lifestyle | High-level activity bout features+sociodemographic and lifestyle | ||||
| Norm-0 | Norm-2 | Norm-0 | Norm-2 | Norm-0 | Norm-2 | ||
| Random forest | |||||||
| T2D-positive | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.77 | |
| T2D-negative | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.63 | |
| Logistic regression | |||||||
| T2D-positive | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.77 | |
| T2D-negative | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.65 | |
| Extreme gradient boosting | |||||||
| T2D-positive | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | |
| T2D- negative | 0.77 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.63 | |
aT2D: type 2 diabetes.