Table 2.
Pearson correlation between handgrip strength and BMD in children and adolescents (n = 243)
| Handgrip Strength | ||
|---|---|---|
| R | P-value | |
| Boys (n = 171) | ||
| BMD Arms (g/cm2) | 0.725 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Legs (g/cm2) | 0.771 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Pelvis (g/cm2) | 0.735 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Trunk (g/cm2) | 0.720 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Spine (g/cm2) | 0.604 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Total (g/cm2) | 0.685 | ≤0.001* |
| Girls (n = 72) | ||
| BMD Arms (g/cm2) | 0.764 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Legs (g/cm2) | 0.775 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Pelvis (g/cm2) | 0.795 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Trunk (g/cm2) | 0.801 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Spine (g/cm2) | 0.493 | ≤0.001* |
| BMD Total (g/cm2) | 0.797 | ≤0.001* |
BMD bone mineral density, * = p-value< 0.05