Table 2.
Three layers model used to compare 2 regimes of connection between pragmatic phenomenology and global knowledge production.
| Coupling model | EBMa clinical trials regime through patient organizations and Claude Bernard | Full participatory action research non-EBM regimes |
| Types | 1, 1+, 2, 2+ | M |
| Level of global scientific research | Epistemology of the EBM [16] | Epistemologies of comprehensive research (such as action research [17] or grounded theories [18]) |
| Level of rational work, local or in group | OHERICb-describable protocols [4]; work in a patient organization may allow relating experiential knowledge acquired through pragmatic phenomenology to EBM protocols | Comprehensive organization through participatory M category action research |
| Level of individual experiential knowledge | Dewey’s pragmatic phenomenology of each patient | Pragmatic phenomenology of each patient |
aEBM: evidence-based medicine.
bOHERIC: initial Observation, Hypothesis, Experiment proper, Result, Interpretation, and Conclusion.