Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;9(1):e16. doi: 10.2196/jopm.8933

Table 2.

Three layers model used to compare 2 regimes of connection between pragmatic phenomenology and global knowledge production.

Coupling model EBMa clinical trials regime through patient organizations and Claude Bernard Full participatory action research non-EBM regimes
Types 1, 1+, 2, 2+ M
Level of global scientific research Epistemology of the EBM [16] Epistemologies of comprehensive research (such as action research [17] or grounded theories [18])
Level of rational work, local or in group OHERICb-describable protocols [4]; work in a patient organization may allow relating experiential knowledge acquired through pragmatic phenomenology to EBM protocols Comprehensive organization through participatory M category action research
Level of individual experiential knowledge Dewey’s pragmatic phenomenology of each patient Pragmatic phenomenology of each patient

aEBM: evidence-based medicine.

bOHERIC: initial Observation, Hypothesis, Experiment proper, Result, Interpretation, and Conclusion.