Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 14;229:117743. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117743

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Comparison of variant network assignments between task and rest states. (A) The network assignments for variants are shown for task and rest states in MSC02 and MSC06. (B) The distributions for the networks that variants are assigned to in rest and task states are also shown across all subjects. (C) The likelihood of a variant in one state being assigned to the same network in the opposite state within a subject is plotted for each MSC subject. The empty black circles represent the likelihood of the variants in one subject being assigned to the same network in another subject. Comparisons were also made for whole-brain seedmaps (Fig. S10) and for network assignments performed at the vertex-level rather than on contiguous variants (Fig. S11), where again strong consistency was seen across states relative to across people. Note that MSC03 has fewer variants than other participants in both states, and thus their data is much more susceptible to noise (see Fig. S11 for evidence of high stability of MSC03 variants at the vertex level).