Table 5.
Multilevel regression of CBCL problem behaviors on IPV, neighborhood, and parenting factors.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b (se) | z | b (se) | z | b (se) | z | b (se) | z | |
| Internalizing problems | ||||||||
| IPV | 2.33 (.97) | 2.40* | 2.12 (.99) | 2.14* | 1.98 (1.39) | 1.42 | 1.65 (1.45) | 1.14 |
| Neigh conc eco disadv | – | – | 1.20 (1.58) | .76 | −.02 (.003) | .57 | −.02 (.003) | −.07 |
| Neighborhood CIC | – | – | −1.01 (1.18) | −.85 | −1.58 (1.64) | −.96 | −.88 (1.74) | −.51 |
| Neighborhood NSC | – | – | 2.74(1.26) | 2.18* | 1.02 (1.78) | .57 | 1.75 (1.86) | .94 |
| IPV × neigh eco disadv | – | – | – | – | −4.01 (2.37) | −1.69+ | −3.47 (2.44) | −1.43 |
| IPV × neigh CIC | – | – | – | – | 1.42 (2.33) | .61 | 1.30 (2.45) | .53 |
| IPV × neigh NSC | – | – | – | – | 3.23 (2.36) | 1.37 | 2.75 (2.45) | 1.12 |
| Eliciting | – | – | – | – | – | – | −2.24 (1.01) | −2.21* |
| Connectedness | – | – | – | – | – | – | −.22 (1.03) | −.21 |
| Hostility | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.59 (1.65) | 1.56 |
| Harsh parental discipline | – | – | – | – | – | – | −.60 (1.30) | −.46 |
| Externalizing problems | ||||||||
| IPV | 3.34 (.96) | 3.48*** | 3.22 (.97) | 3.30*** | 1.38 (1.37) | 1.01 | .63 (1.39) | .45 |
| Neigh conc eco disadv | – | – | 1.44 (1.49) | .97 | −.001 (.003) | 2.52* | −.001 (.003) | .11 |
| Neighborhood CIC | – | – | −1.38 (1.17) | −1.18 | −3.97 (1.62) | −2.45* | −3.37 (1.67) | −2.01* |
| Neighborhood NSC | – | – | .56 (1.24) | .45 | −1.29 (1.75) | −.74 | −1.89 (1.77) | −1.07 |
| IPV × neigh eco disadv | – | – | – | – | −1.58 (2.34) | −.68 | −.99 (2.37) | −.42 |
| IPV × neigh CIC | – | – | – | – | 5.75 (2.32) | 1.62* | 4.99 (2.36) | 2.11* |
| IPV × neigh NSC | – | – | – | – | 3.75 (2.32) | 1.62 | 3.86 (2.35) | 1.64 |
| Eliciting | – | – | – | – | – | – | −3.86 (.96) | −4.01*** |
| Connectedness | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.00 (.99) | .97 |
| Hostility | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4.04 (1.59) | 2.53* |
| Harsh parental discipline | – | – | – | – | – | – | −.16 (1.24) | −.13 |
Note. CIC = potential for community involvement with children; NSC = negative social climate. All models are adjusted for child gender, parental education, family income-to-needs ratio, and the number of ratable episodes in the observational interview.
+
p < .10;
*
p < .05;
**
p < .01.