Table 3.
Comparison of the demographic and radiographic findings of the patients in our study with that of the published literature
| Study | Age (years) | Female:male ratio | BMI (kg/m2) | Duration (months) | KL Grading (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | |||||
| Present study | 54.52±9.44 | 63:22 (2.86) | 28.91±3.69 | 24.24±19.14 | 12.9 | 21.2 | 25.9 | 40 |
| Naredo et al.[19] | 64±7.6 | Not assessed | 31.8±5.1 | Not assessed | 25.5 | 37.7 | 33.3 | 3.3 |
| Chan et al.[15] | 59.0±13.9 | 143:50 (2.86) | 24.9±4.1 | Not assessed | 17.1 | 22.3 | 22.3 | 16.6 |
| Bevers et al.[22] | 57±9.2 | 120:60 (2.00) | 28.8±7.4 | 103±114 | 23.9 | 38.9 | 17.8 | 8.3 |
| Podlipská et al.[20] | 59.9±7.8 | 49:30 (1.63) | 29.1±4.3 | Not assessed | 26.6 | 24.1 | 25.3 | 21.5 |
| Serban et al.[16] | 63.44±9.49 | 33:19 (1.73) | 31.73±6.42 | Not assessed | 41.5 | 31.7 | 24.4 | 2.4 |
BMI: Body mass index, KL grading: Kellgren–Lawrence grading