Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Feb 19;4(1):e23313. doi: 10.2196/23313

Table 3.

Correlations between the mean values of the four MARS-G subdimensions, overall rating and user star rating.

Characteristics		MARS-G^a
		Engagement	P value	Functionality	P value	Aesthetics	P value	Information	P value	Overall rating	P value
MARS-G
	Engagement	—^b	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Functionality	.52	<.001	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Aesthetics	.62	<.001	.54	<.001	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Information	.55	<.001	.33	.002	.58	<.001	—	—	—	—
	Overall rating	.83	<.001	.68	<.001	.85	<.001	.83	<.001	—	—
User star rating^c		.27	.03	.11	.38	.19	.13	.32	.01	.30	.01

^aMARS-G: German version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale.

^bNot applicable.

^cCorrelations were calculated with 69 mobile apps since the user star rating was missing for 14 apps.