Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2021 Apr 28;17(4):e1009507. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009507

Structures of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization

Yong He 1,2,#, Kun Li 3,#, Yimei Cao 3, Zixian Sun 2, Pinghua Li 3, Huifang Bao 3, Sheng Wang 3, Guoqiang Zhu 3, Xingwen Bai 3, Pu Sun 3, Xuerong Liu 4, Cheng Yang 1, Zaixin Liu 3,*, Zengjun Lu 3,*, Zihe Rao 1,2,*, Zhiyong Lou 2,*
Editor: Richard J Kuhn5
PMCID: PMC8081260  PMID: 33909694

Abstract

The development of a universal vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is hindered by cross-serotype antigenic diversity and by a lack of knowledge regarding neutralization of the virus in natural hosts. In this study, we isolated serotype O-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) (F145 and B77) from recovered natural bovine hosts by using the single B cell antibody isolation technique. We also identified a serotype O/A cross-reacting NAb (R50) and determined virus-NAb complex structures by cryo-electron microscopy at near-atomic resolution. F145 and B77 were shown to engage the capsid of FMDV-O near the icosahedral threefold axis, binding to the BC/HI-loop of VP2. In contrast, R50 engages the capsids of both FMDV-O and FMDV-A between the 2- and 5-fold axes and binds to the BC/EF/GH-loop of VP1 and to the GH-loop of VP3 from two adjacent protomers, revealing a previously unknown antigenic site. The cross-serotype neutralizing epitope recognized by R50 is highly conserved among serotype O/A. These findings help to elucidate FMDV neutralization by natural hosts and provide epitope information for the development of a universal vaccine for cross-serotype protection against FMDV.

Author summary

FMDV is the causative agent of foot-and-mouth disease, one of the most contagious and economically devastating diseases of cloven-hoofed animals. The antigenic diversities of the currently known epitopes throughout FMDV serotypes and the lack of understanding of FMDV neutralization in natural hosts limit the development of a vaccine that is able to provide cross-serotype protection. In this work, we isolated FMDV serotype O-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) (F145 and B77) and a serotype O/A cross-reacting NAb (R50) from recovered natural bovine hosts and determined virus-NAb complex structures by cryo-electron microscopy at near-atomic resolution. Structures of virus-NAb complex reveal F145 and B77 engage the capsid of FMDV-O near the icosahedral threefold axis. In contrast, R50 engages the capsids of both FMDV-O and FMDV-A between the 2- and 5-fold axes, revealing a previously unknown antigenic site. This is the first time to present structure details of FMDV neutralization by natural hosts. And this work also provides epitope information for the development of a universal vaccine for cross-serotype protection against FMDV.

Introduction

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), a small nonenveloped single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus (genus Aphthovirus within the family Picornaviridae), is the causative agent of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). FMD is one of the most contagious and economically devastating diseases of cloven-hoofed animals in many developing regions of Asia, Africa and South America[13]. FMDV exists as seven immunologically distinct serotypes (O, A, C, SAT1, SAT2, SAT3 and Asia1)[4]. Among them, serotypes O and A are the most common causative agents of FMDV outbreaks globally[5,6]. Vaccination is believed to play a predominant role in the control and prevention of FMDV[7]. However, the antigenic diversities of the currently known epitopes throughout FMDV serotypes and the lack of understanding of FMDV neutralization in natural hosts limit the development of a vaccine that is able to provide cross-serotype protection[811].

As the major antigen, the virus capsid of FMDV comprises 60 copies each of four virus-encoded proteins, VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4; VP1 to VP3 form most of the capsid shell, with VP4 lining the interior surface[12,13]. At present, there is limited structural information regarding how FDMV engages with neutralizing antibody (NAb). The cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the FMDV-C-S8c1-SD6 Fab complex shows that the murine Fab fragment SD6 binds to the VP1 GH-loop (residues 136–147), and the GH-loop plays a key role in the interaction with integrin receptors[14,15].

As a natural host of FMDV, bovines have a different immunoglobulin (Ig) repertoire than other vertebrates, which display restricted lengths of the third heavy chain complement determining region (HCDR3), averaging 12–16 amino acids. Bovines, however, produce antibodies with HCDR3s that average ~ 26 amino acids, with an ultralong subset (10–15% of the repertoire) that contains greater than 70 amino acids[1618]. These characteristic Ig sequences point to bovines as a promising host for producing high-affinity and broadly neutralizing antibodies. This is exemplified by the rapid elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV after bovine immunization; these broadly neutralizing antibodies contain ultralong HCDR3s that are responsible for their serological breadth and potency[19].

As yet, it is unclear exactly how FMDV is neutralized by natural bovine host NAbs and whether an epitope exists that can elicit cross-serotype NAbs. In a previous study, we reported the isolation of two serotype O-specific NAbs (F145 and B77) from recovered natural bovine hosts through the single B cell antibody isolation technique[20]. In the current study, we isolated a NAb (R50) that neutralizes FMDV serotypes O and A. We determined the cryo-EM structures of FMDV serotype O (O/Tibet/99) in complex with B77 and F145 scFv, as well as R50 scFv in complex with FMDV serotype O (O/Tibet/99) and with serotype A (A/WH/CHA/09). The near atomic level details reveal a key epitope for cross-serotype neutralization and inform a structure-based rationale to design a universal FMDV vaccine that can elicit intertypic cross-reacting NAbs.

Results

Isolation of antibodies from bovine plasmablasts

Upon isolating two FMDV serotype O-specific antibodies (B77 and F145) from a natural bovine host[20], we aimed to isolate a cross-serotype NAb that can neutralize both serotype O and A. FMDV (O/Tibet/99) (hereafter named FMDV-OTi) and FMDV (A/WH/CHA/09) (hereafter named FMDV-AWH) were applied as baits to isolate specific memory B cells from natural bovine host blood, which displayed strong cross-reactivity with both serotype O and A. As revealed in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), CD21+IgM- O-FMDV+ A-FMDV+ B cells are extremely rare, displaying 21 per million PBMCs. Via FACS, a total of 96 single CD21+IgM- O-FMDV+ A-FMDV+ B cells were sorted for the amplification of the IgG BCR variable gene and the development of a FMDV serotype O and A cross-neutralizing scFv antibody (Fig 1A). Finally, 60 paired IgG clones from these cross-reactivity B cells were successfully amplified. Of these, 14 scFv antibodies displayed cross-reactivity with both FMDV serotype O and A. But, only R50 scFv antibody showed cross-neutralizing activity with both FMDV serotype O and A.

Fig 1. Isolation of NAbs.

Fig 1

(A) Confirmation of the phenotype and proportion of FMDV serotype O and serotype A cross-reactive plasmablasts in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Bovine PBMCs were analyzed by four-color flow cytometry. Gate 1 (P1) was selected to exclude cell debris, with lower values of SSC-A and FSC-A, and was further analyzed to gate singlets (P2) based on the diagonal streak of the FSC-A vs. FSC-H plot. The CD21+IgM- B cells (P3) were gated to check the distributions of O-FMDV- A-FMDV+ (P4), O-FMDV+ A-FMDV- (P6) and O-FMDV+ A-FMDV+ (P5) population, in the presence (Bovine 2334 sample-P3) or absence (Bovine 2334 FMO-P3) of bait antigens. (B)The binding activity of R50 scFv with FMDV serotype O and A strains. The O/Mya/98, O/HN/CHA/93, O/XJ/CHA/2017, A/GDMM/CHA/2013 and A/WH/CHA/09 strains were separately used to infect BHK-21 cells. The binding activity of R50-ScFv (concentration, 0–50 μg/ml) with the infected BHK-21 cells was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean and represent two independent experiments. (C) Evaluation of bovine-derived FMDV-neutralizing scFv antibodies for neutralization and potency. Values are neutralization titer (NT) in μg/ml. An NT value of 100 μg/ml was used as a cutoff for neutralization, and >100 μg/ml was defined as showing no virus-neutralizing activity. NT values of 0–10 μg/ml are red, 10–25 μg/ml are orange, 25–50 μg/ml are blue, and ˃100 μg/ml are white.

To further investigate the neutralization breadth and potency of R50 scFv antibody, we propagated, purified three representative strains of FMDV serotype O (O/Mya/98; O/HN/CHA/93; O/Tibet/99) obtained from three currently epidemic topotypes (SEA, Cathay, and ME-SA, respectively) and two representative strains of FMDV serotype A (A/WH/CHA/09; A/GDMM/CHA/2013) from the Asia topotypes SEA-97/G1 and G2 in China[21], and separately examined their binding and neutralization abilities by flow cytometry and microneutralization assay. The flow cytometry showed that R50 scFv binds to the three topotypes of FMDV serotype O and the two distinctive strains of FMDV serotype A (Fig 1B). In line with the binding results, microneutralization assay also revealed that R50 scFv cross-neutralizes these strains of FMDV serotype O and A (Fig 1C). In contrast, B77 and F145 scFv only neutralize the three representative strains of FMDV serotype O(Fig 1C), as previously reported [20].

Overall architectures of the FMDV-NAb complexes

To clarify the mechanism of cross-serotype neutralization, we determined the structures of B77 and F145 scFv in complex with FMDV-OTi, as well as R50 scFv in complex with FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH (S1 Fig). The cryo-EM micrographs indicated the presence of scFv on the FMDV capsids at distinct locations (Fig 2). The final resolution of the cryo-EM reconstruction was estimated by the FSC 0.143 cutoff to be 3.90 Å for the FMDV-OTi-B77 complex, 3.68 Å for the FMDV-OTi-F145 complex, 3.94 Å for the FMDV-OTi-R50 complex and 3.49 Å for the FMDV-AWH-R50 complex (S1 Fig).

Fig 2. Cryo-EM structures.

Fig 2

(A-D) The central cross-sections through the cryo-EM maps of FMDV-OTi-B77 complex (A), FMDV-OTi-F145 complex (B), FMDV-OTi-R50 complex (C) and FMDV-AWH-R50 complex (D) are shown with the icosahedral two-, three- and five-fold axes. Each image in the 480-pixel boxes corresponds to 446 Å in each dimension. Scale bars, 100 Å. (E-H) Rendered images of the FMDV-OTi-B77 complex (E), FMDV-OTi-F145 complex (F), FMDV-OTi-R50 complex (G) and FMDV-AWH-R50 complex (H). Depth cueing with color is used to indicate radius (< 120 Å, blue; 130–150 Å, from cyan to yellow; > 160 Å, red). The icosahedral five- and three-fold axes are represented by pentagons and triangles, respectively. (I-L) Footprints of B77, F145 and R50 on the FMDV surface. The figure shows a 2D projection of the FMDV surface produced using RIVEM. 5-, 3-, and 2-fold icosahedral symmetry axes are marked as pentagons, triangles, and ovals, respectively, on one icosahedral asymmetrical unit. The spherical polar angles (θ, ϕ) define the location on the icosahedral surface. The depictions are radially depth cued from blue (radius = 130 Å) to red (radius = 155 Å). The residues in the scFv footprints are shown in purple.

Three B77 or F145 scFv molecules bind to the FMDV-OTi capsid around an icosahedral threefold axis (Fig 2A, 2B, 2E and 2F). By contrast, R50 scFv binds to a depression between the 2- and 5-fold axes of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH (Fig 2C, 2D, 2G and 2H). In all cases, the cryo-EM densities were of sufficient quality to allow the atomic modeling of FMDV capsid proteins and the NAb scFv variable loops that are responsible for virus recognition. However, the densities of the bound NAbs away from the contact surface were not sufficiently clear to trace all main chains (S2 Fig). The footprints of B77, F145 and R50 on the capsid surface were also mapped (Fig 2I–2L).

The lengths of bovine HCDR3 feature a trimodal distribution: group 1 comprises very short HCDR3s (≤10 amino acids); group 2 comprises intermediate lengths (11 to 47 amino acids); and group 3 comprises ultralong HCDR3s (≥48 amino acids)[22,23]. The structures show that B77 contains an intermediate length HCDR3 loop with 18 amino acids, but F145 and R50 contain ultralong HCDR3 loops (50 and 61 amino acids, respectively) (S3 Table). The ultralong HCDR3s form an elongated “stalk” and a globular “knob” at the distal ends of the stalks, and the stalk region is essentially a display scaffold to deliver the knob domain, which functions as an effector domain that mediates the molecular recognition of antigen. The globular knob of F145 interacts with VP2, but the globular knob of R50 binds to a shallow depression on the capsid, contacting the two major capsid proteins VP1 and VP3 from two adjacent protomers (S3 Fig).

Interaction of B77 and F145 with FMDV-OTi

The complex structures show that B77 and F145 make similar contacts with the BC-loop and HI-loop of FMDV-OTi VP2. Residues in the VP2 BC-loop (OTi-VP2T71 and OTi-VP2S72) and in the VP2 HI-loop (OTi-VP2N190 and OTi-VP2Q196) interact with residues B77-VHM56, B77-VHT101, B77-VHS105, B77-VHL108 and B77-VHW114 in the B77 heavy chain (S4 Table). The OTi-VP2T71 and OTi-VP2S72 side chains form hydrogen bond contacts with side chain atoms of B77-VHT101 and B77-VHW114 (Fig 3A and S4 Table). The side chains of OTi-VP2T190 and OTi-VP2Q196 form hydrogen bond contacts with the side chain atoms of B77-VHM56 and B77-VHS105 (Fig 3A and S4 Table). In addition, OTi-VP2H65 and OTi-VP2D68 in βB and the BC-loop interact with residues B77-VHW93 and B77-VHS95 in the light chain of B77 (S4 Table). The side chain of OTi-VP2H65 forms hydrogen bonds or van der Waals contacts with the side chain atoms of B77-VLS95 (Fig 3A and S4 Table). To further confirm the epitope, neutralization escape mutants were screened under B77 immune pressure. The B77-resistant mutants were isolated and characterized. An Asn→Ser mutation occurred at position 190 of VP2; this position is located in the virus-antibody binding interface and is strictly conserved among serotype O (S4 Table and Fig 3C).

Fig 3. B77 and F145 bind to FMDV-OTi.

Fig 3

(A) Close-up view of FMDV-OTi-B77 interaction interface. VH and VL of B77 are purple and orange. Contacting residues are displayed as sticks with the same color scheme as in the main chain. Dashed lines indicate contacts with potential hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. Amino acid side chains are colored blue (nitrogen) and red (oxygen). (B) Close-up views of FMDV-OTi-F145 interaction interface. VH of F145 is cyan. (C) Sequence alignment of FMDV serotype O and serotype A. Residues with red or yellow backgrounds are identical or conserved, respectively. Residues at the FMDV-OTi-B77 and FMDV-OTi-F145 interfaces are indicated with red and black triangles, respectively. The same contacting residues are highlighted in blue boxes. Alignment was performed by CLUSTALW, and the figure was generated by ESPript. (D) Virus titers (pfu/ml) of the wild-type (O/Tibet/99) and its mutants (VP2S72D, VP2N190S and VP2T191S) were determined by plaque forming assay. (E) Plaque phenotypes formed in BHK-21 cells and the sizes were correlated to the CPE patterns. (F) Neutralizing efficacy of F145 against the wild-type (O/Tibet/99) and mutants (VP2S72D, VP2N190S and VP2T191S) were evaluated using a micro-neutralization assay. The neutralization titer (NT) represented the lowest antibody concentration required to fully prevent CPE. *** indicates significant difference to wild-type at P<0.001. ** indicates significant difference to wild-type at P<0.01.

F145 interacts with the VP2 BC-loop (OTi-VP2T71 and OTi-VP2S72) and the HI-loop (OTi-VP2V189, OTi-VP2N190, OTi-VP2T191) (S5 Table). The side chains of OTi-VP2S72 and OTi-VP2T191 form hydrogen bond contacts with the side chain atoms of F145-VHS119 and F145-VHT128(Fig 3B and S5 Table). The amide nitrogen of OTi-VP2N190 provides additional stabilization via hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of F145-VHD129 (Fig 3B and S5 Table). To further confirm the epitope, neutralization escape mutants were generated under F145 immune pressure. The F145-resistant mutants were isolated and characterized. A Ser→Ala mutation was found at position 72 in VP2, which is also located in the virus-antibody binding interface.

FMDV employs heparin sulfate (HS) and integrin (generally avβ6) as receptors[24,25]. In the cellular entry of FMDV-O, HS acts as a primary receptor that allows for rapid cell binding, thereby providing more time for virus binding to integrins[26]. FMDV binding to the integrin receptor is facilitated by a conserved arginine-glycine-aspartic (RGD) motif in the exposed GH-loop of VP1[25]. Structure comparisons of FMDV-integrin and FMDV-NAbs show obvious clashes between NAbs (B77 and F145) and the integrin receptor, suggesting that FMDV neutralization by B77 and F145 is facilitated by blocking virus-receptor interaction via steric hindrance (S7 Fig). Meanwhile, in vivo the antibodies are IgG molecules or some other multi-site entity, a situation that could result in aggregation of virus particles if one virus particle becomes crosslinked with another. Aggregation of virus particles can cause a reduction in the number of infectious virions available to interact with receptor and may result in the neutralization.

Determinant for the serotype O-specificity of F145 and B77

F145 and B77 neutralized FMDV-OTi but did not have a neutralizing effect against FMDV-AWH (Fig 1C). The structural alignment of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH capsid proteins showed no substantial conformational changes in the VP2 BC-loop and HI-loop, which are the epitopes of B77 and F145 (S4 Fig). The sequence alignment of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH exhibited distinct amino acid differences on the epitopes of B77 and F145, indicating that the variation of critical amino acid residues may be the determinant for serotype-specific recognition (Fig 3C).

For B77, we identified that the neutralization escape mutation OTi-VP2N190→AWH-VP2S190 enables the escape of antibody-mediated neutralization (virus neutralization [VN] titer >400 μg/ml) (Fig 3C and S8 Table). For F145, we mutated FMDV-OTi amino acid by FMDV-AWH’s sequence at the corresponding positions (S72D, N190S and T191S), rescued virions by reverse genetics approach and evaluated the neutralization capacity using virus neutralization test (VNT). All mutated viruses could be rescued with an acceptable attenuated proliferation and cytopathic effect (CPE) (Fig 3D and 3E). The VNT results showed that FMDV-OTi with the OTi-VP2N190S mutation exhibited a 2.9-fold reduction in VN titer, and the OTi-VP2S72D mutation resulted in a significant reduction (~30-fold) in VN titer (Fig 3F). These results suggest that VP2 S72 and N190 play the most essential roles in the serotype O-specific neutralization activity of F145 and B77.

FMDV-OTi-R50 and FMDV-AWH-R50 interfaces

R50 binds FMDV-OTi VP1 and VP3 by its heavy chain (Fig 4A). The antibody-interacting residues on the FMDV-OTi capsid are located in the VP1 BC-loop (residues OTi-VP1V50 and OTi-VP1D52), VP1 EF-loop (residues OTi-VP1P94 and OTi-VP1E95), VP1 GH-loop (residues OTi-VP1R157, OTi-VP1L159 and OTi-VP1P160) and VP3 GH-loop (residues OTi-VP3D173 and OTi-VP3T177) (S6 Table). The interacting residues in R50 are located in HCDR3, including residues R50-VHR119, R50-VHW120, R50-VHY130, R50-VHN132, R50-VHY138, R50-VHG139, R50-VHR140, R50-VHC141 and R50-VHT142 (S6 Table). The side chain of R50-VHR140 extends into a deep cavity and forms interactions with OTi-VP1D52 in the VP1 BC-loop and OTi-VP1L159 in the VP1 GH-loop (Fig 4A and S6 Table). Residues OTi-VP1V50, OTi-VP1R157 and OTi-VP1P161 also stabilize the virus-antibody interaction by interacting with R50-VHW120 and R50-VHT142(Fig 4A and S6 Table). In addition, the small protruding structure formed by OTi-VP1P94 and OTi-VP1E95 of the VP1 EF-loop makes contact with R50-VHR119, R50-VHC131 and R50-VHN132(Fig 4A and S6 Table). One salt bridge between OTi-VP1E95 and R50-VHR119 was inferred because the centroids of the oppositely charged functional groups of the residues were within a 4 Å cutoff and because the Glu carbonyl oxygen atom was within 4 Å from the nitrogen atom of the Arg side chain (Fig 4A and S6 Table). Moreover, the side chains of OTi-VP3D173 and OTi-VP3T177 form hydrogen bonds with the side chains of R50-VHY130 and R50-VHY138, respectively (Fig 4A and S6 Table).

Fig 4. Structure of FMDV-OTi-R50 complex.

Fig 4

(A) Surface representation of FMDV-OTi-R50 showing the interaction interface between R50 (ribbon diagram) and the capsid. The interface is framed and shown as a close-up view in the right panel. The residues in R50 responsible for interacting with the capsid are shown as yellow sticks. The interface amino acid residues in VP3 (B) and VP1 (C) are colored magenta and labeled; the interface residues in R50 are colored yellow and labeled (D).

The interaction of R50 with FMDV-AWH is homologous to that observed in the FMDV-OTi-R50 complex; R50 makes contact with FMDV-AWH VP1 and VP3 (Fig 5A). In FMDV-AWH VP1, residues that participate in antibody binding are located in the BC-loop (residues AWH-VP1V50 and AWH-VP1D52), EF-loop (residues AWH-VP1P94 and AWH-VP1E95), and GH-loop (AWH-VP1Q156, AWH-VP1L157 and AWH-VP1P158) (S7 Table). The antibody-interacting residues of FMDV-AWH VP3 are located in the GH-loop (residues AWH-VP3D174 and AWH-VP3V175) (S7 Table). The side chain of R50-VHR140 extends into the deep cavities and contacts AWH-VP1D52 in the BC-loop and AWH-VP1L157 in the GH-loop (Fig 5A and S7 Table). Residues AWH-VP1V50, AWH-VP1Q156, AWH-VP1P158 and R50-VHW120 also help stabilize the virus-antibody interaction in this region (Fig 5A and S7 Table). Additionally, the small protruding structure formed by AWH-VP1P94 and AWH-VP1E95 of the EF-loop contacts the residues R50-VHR119, R50-VHC131 and R50-VHN132(Fig 5A and S7 Table). The side chain of AWH-VP1E95 can form salt bridges with the side chain of R50-VHR119. Moreover, the side chains of AWH-VP3D174 and AWH-VP3V175 form hydrogen bonds with the side chains of R50-VHY130 and R50-VHY138, respectively (Fig 5A and S7 Table).

Fig 5. Structure of FMDV-AWH-R50 complex.

Fig 5

(A) Surface representation of FMDV-AWH-R50 showing the interaction interface between R50 (ribbon diagram) and the capsid. The interface is framed and shown as a close-up view in the right panel. The residues in R50 responsible for interacting with the capsid are indicated by light blue sticks. The interface amino acid residues in VP3 (B) and VP1 (C) are colored pink and labeled; the interface residues in R50 are colored light blue and labeled (D). (E) Sequence alignment of FMDV type O and A. Residues with red or yellow backgrounds are identical or conserved, respectively. Residues in the FMDV-OTi-R50 and FMDV-AWH-R50 interaction interfaces are indicated with black and red triangles, respectively. The same interface residues are highlighted in blue boxes. (F) Neutralizing efficacy of R50 against the wild-type (O/Tibet/99) and mutants was evaluated using a micro-neutralization assay. The neutralization titer (NT) represented the lowest antibody concentration required to fully prevent CPE. *** indicates significant difference to wild-type at P<0.001. ** indicates significant difference to wild-type at P<0.01. (G) Neutralizing efficacy of R50 against the wild-type (A/WH/CHA/09) and mutants were evaluated using a micro-neutralization assay.

The sequence alignment of FMDV serotype O and A shows that the common residues that contact R50 are strictly conserved in all five representative strains of FMDV serotypes O and A; these residues are VP1V50, VP1D52, VP1P94, VP1E95, VP1L159 (corresponding to VP1L157 of FMDV-AWH), VP1P160 (corresponding to VP1P158 of FMDV-AWH) and VP3D173 (corresponding to VP3D174 of FMDV-AWH) (Fig 5E). To validate the virus-antibody interactions, we substituted alanine for FMDV-OTi capsid residues whose side chains are involved in antibody binding. The mutated viruses were rescued and assessed for neutralization breadth and potency. Mutations at six individual sites (OTi-VP1V50A, OTi-VP1D52A, OTi-VP1P94A, OTi-VP1E95A, OTi-VP1P160A and OTi-VP3D173A) attenuated virus proliferation and produced less CPE. However, OTi-VP1L159A increased virus proliferation and grew with greater CPE (S5 Fig). All these mutations reduced the antibody-mediated neutralization of R50. Particularly, the mutation OTi-VP1E95A completely escaped antibody-mediated neutralization (VN titer > 250 μg/ml) (Fig 5F). Meanwhile, we also performed mutagenesis experiments on the FMDV-AWH capsid. The mutations at five individual sites (AWH-VP1D52A, AWH-VP1P94A, AWH-VP1E95A, AWH-VP1P158A and AWH-VP3D174) attenuated virus proliferation and produced less CPE. However, AWH-VP1L157A increased virus proliferation and grew with greater CPE (S6 Fig). All these mutations reduced the antibody-mediated neutralization of R50. In particular, the mutations AWH-VP1D52A and AWH-VP1E95A enabled complete escape of antibody-mediated neutralization (VN titer > 250 μg/ml) (Fig 5G). These results demonstrate the presence of conserved epitopes for the cross-serotype neutralization of FMDV by R50.

Notably, the R50 footprint on the FMDV capsid does not overlap with identified receptor binding sites (S7 and S8 Figs), indicating that R50 may not directly compete with the binding of receptor. Previous studies have reported that A9-Fab destabilized EV71 virions and as much as 70% of EV71 F-particles had been destroyed when incubated with A9-Fab at 37°C [27]. When we incubated FMDV-OTi or FMDV-AWH with R50 at a molar ratio of 1:240 for 30 s or 60 s at 4°C, the negative stain electron micrographs showed that R50 destabilized the virus particle and induced dissociation of virus particles into capsid pentamers, and very few particles remained intact after 60 s (S9 Fig). Meanwhile, the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) micrographs also showed significantly lower particle density when incubated for 30s (S1 Fig). In contrast to this remarkable effect, B77 did not induce significant decrease of particle density even after one hour incubation at 4°C (S9 Fig). These results indicated a possible neutralization mechanism of R50 by promoting the dissociation of FMDV virions before infection.

Discussion

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) causes a highly contagious disease in bovines and other cloven-hoofed animals. Difficulties facing the prevention and control of FMDV include a high morbidity, a complex host range, and broad antigenic diversity[28]. Control of the disease in endemic regions has been mainly based on large-scale vaccinations. It is known that vaccination with one serotype cannot confer adequate protection against strains of different serotypes or heterologous strains of the same serotype based on antigenic variation; furthermore, the protection response is not immediate[29]. It is important to develop universal protective vaccines against the seven FMDV serotypes. However, the cross-serotype effectiveness of the available FMDV vaccine is limited. A previous work constructed chimeric virus-like particles displaying tandem repeats of B cell epitopes (VP1 residues 134–161 and 200–213) derived from FMDV serotypes O and A using a truncated HBc carrier; the chimeric VLPs elicited moderate neutralization antibodies against FMDV serotypes O and A in mice[30].

At present, five functionally independent neutralizing antigen sites recognized by murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified on the capsid surface of FMDV serotype O by neutralization escape mutants[3134]. Site 1 is linear and trypsin-sensitive; it encompasses the GH-loop and the carboxy terminus of VP1, with critical amino acid substitutions at residues 144, 148, 154 and 208. However, sites 2–5 are all conformational and trypsin-resistant. Site 2 (isolated after pressure from C6 or C9 NAbs) is defined in the BC-loop and EF-loop of VP2 and involves critical amino acid substitutions at residues 70–73, 75, 77, and 131. Site 3 (isolated after pressure from C8 NAb) is defined in the BC-loop of VP1, with critical residues at positions 43 and 44. Critical residues at position 58 in the VP3 B-B “knob” contribute to site 4 (isolated after pressure from 14EH9 NAb). Site 5 (isolated after pressure from C3 NAb) involves an amino acid change at position 149 in the GH-loop of VP1, which is distinct from site 1 even though part of the GH-loop is encompassed. Murine antibodies usually have a short HCDR3 and generally flat binding surfaces. Antigenic sites recognized by murine monoclonal antibodies are all surface-exposed and intra-protomer sites (S10 Fig). The structures of FMDV-OTi in complex with serotype O-specific NAbs F145 and B77 show that the binding sites (BC-loop and HI-loop of VP2) are also surface-exposed and intra-protomer sites. For F145, neutralization escape mutation and reverse genetics reveal that VP2 S72 within antigenic site 2 plays the most essential roles in the serotype O- specific neutralization activity (Fig 6A). For B77, the key epitope residue on VP2 N190 is the major determinant for serotype O-specific recognition. VP2-190 around the threefold axis is a new neutralizing epitope, which is close to antigenic site 2(Fig 6A).

Fig 6. Key epitope residues at the binding interface.

Fig 6

(A) Key epitope residues are shown as spheres on unbound FMDV capsid surface (ribbon diagram) using PyMOL. Site 2 is shown in magenta and F145 in orange. B77 is in cyan, R50 in pink. (B, C) Common residues of FMDV-OTi (B) and FMDV-AWH (C) that contact R50. Contacting residues are displayed as sticks with the same color scheme as in the main chain. In the stick models, the residue numbers are indicated. The VP1 and VP3 residues are labeled with a subscript.

Bovine antibodies with ultralong HCDR3 structures have the advantage to bind to epitopes that are not easily accessible to common antibodies with flatter paratope features. The structures of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH with a cross-serotype NAb R50 exhibit a novel neutralizing antigenic site located in a shallow depression on the capsid, contacting two major capsid proteins VP1 and VP3 from two adjacent protomers. The novel neutralizing antigenic site formed by OTi-VP1V50, OTi-VP1D52, OTi-VP1P94, OTi-VP1E95, OTi-VP1L159(or AWH-VP1L157), OTi-VP1P160 (or AWH-VP1P158) and OTi-VP3D173 (or AWH-VP3D174) is highly conserved among FMDV serotypes O and A (Fig 6B and 6C). Meanwhile, NAb R50 targeting the novel antigenic site can induce a broad-spectrum cross-neutralizing response against diverse isolates of serotype O and A. Therefore, this could be a target for development of universal vaccine.

Methods

Ethics statement

All animal experiments in the study were approved by the Review Board of Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (permit no. LVRIAEC 2018–006) and were conducted in accordance with the Ethics Procedures and Guidelines for Animal Use of the People’s Republic of China.

Virus production and purification

FMDV (O/Tibet/99) or FMDV (A/WH/CHA/09) was grown in baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cells. Inactivated O/Tibet/99 and A/WH/CHA/09 whole virus antigens were kindly provided by an FMD inactivated vaccine manufacturer. For further purification, virus antigens in the supernatant were precipitated by incubating at 4°C overnight in 8% (w/v) PEG 6,000. The precipitated virus antigens were harvested by centrifugation at 3,500 g for 1 h at 4°C, followed by resuspension in pH 7.4 PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 50 mM Na2HPO4 and 10 mM KH2PO4). The viruses were purified through a sucrose cushion that transferred the samples to an ultracentrifuge tube. A 10 ml aliquot of 30% (w/v) sucrose was gently added to the bottom of the suspension, and the sample was centrifuged at 35,000 g for 1.5 h. The sucrose was removed from the pellet, and 500 μl of PBS was added to cover the pellet. The supernatant was purified over a 20–60% sucrose gradient and fractionated by centrifugation at 35,000 g for 4 h at 4°C. The fractions were analyzed by negative stain electron microscopy, and the virus fraction was transferred to a 100 kDa MWCO centrifugal filter for buffer exchange with PBS to remove the sucrose.

Bovine infection

One 1-year-old healthy Qinchuan bovine (Bos Taurus), a Chinese breed of beef bovine, was raised in an animal biosafety level 3 laboratory for the sorting of antigen-specific antibody-secreting B cells after FMDV infection. The bovine, designated as #2334, was first challenged subcutaneously at two sites on the tongue with 10,000 BID50 (50% bovine infective dose) of bovine-adapted O/Mya/98 and then received a boost vaccination with O/HN/CHA/93 and O/Tibet/99 respectively on days 35 and 132, as described in our previous report[20]. After day 225, the animal was further challenged subcutaneously at two sites on the tongue with 10,000 BID50 (50% bovine infective dose) of FMDV (A/WH/CHA/09). Serum samples were collected at days 114 after this infection, and heparinized peripheral blood was taken from the jugular veins of the bovine for PBMC isolation.

Identification of FMDV serotype O and A cross-neutralizing Plasmablasts in infected Bovine

PBMCs were isolated from the heparinized blood samples of the bovine with HISTOPAQUE 1.083 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PBMCs were then used to identify FMDV serotype O and serotype A cross-reactive plasmablasts. Purified FMDV (O/Tibet/99) inactivated 146S antigen was labeled with Lightning-Link Rapid FluoProbes 647H (Innova Biosciences, San Diego, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified FMDV (A/WH/CHA/09) inactivated 146S antigen was labeled with Pacific Blue (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Freshly isolated PBMCs were stained with O-FMDV 146S-FluoProbes 647H, A-FMDV 146S-Pacific Blue, mouse anti-bovine CD21-RPE (Bio-Rad, USA) and mouse anti-bovine IgM-FITC (Bio-Rad, USA) for 30 min at 4°C in PBS containing 2 mM EDTA and 0.5% BSA. The parallel staining of PBMCs that lacked O-FMDV 146S-FluoProbes 647H and A-FMDV 146S-Pacific Blue was used as fluorescence minus one (FMO) control. The stained samples were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry, and one million PBMCs were acquired for counting the proportion of FMDV serotype O and A cross-reactive plasmablasts.

Single-Cell sorting of FMDV serotype O and serotype A cross-neutralizing plasmablasts from bovine PBMCs using flow cytometry

The bovine PBMCs stained as above were sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria II, USA) using a 100 μm nozzle. Single-cell mode was set to sort the FMDV CD21+IgM- O-FMDV+ A-FMDV+ cells using flow rate of 10,000 events/s. The subsequent single-cell lysis and cDNA synthesis procedures were performed in accordance with our previous report[20]. The obtained cDNA templates were stored at −20°C for subsequent PCR amplification.

Cloning of scFv gene and construction of pcDNA3.4-scFv expression vector

Amplification of the antibody variable region genes (VH and VL) was performed by nested PCR using primers for bovine IgG gamma and lambda chains (Ig γ and Ig λ; S1 Table)[20]. Because the λ chain accounts for 95% of the bovine light chains, only the λ light chain was amplified by PCR. The final PCR products of paired VH and VL were Sanger sequenced. Single-chain fragment variable (scFv) was designed by splicing the VH and VL genes using a flexible linker (GGGGSGGGGSGGGGS). The N- and C-termini of the scFv included a signal peptide (MNPLWTLLFVLSAPRGVLS) of bovine Ig γ and a His tag, respectively. The scFv genes were synthesized by GenScript Inc. (www.genscript.com) with codon optimization and were expressed in CHO cells, followed by cloning into the pcDNA3.4 vector. The cloned scFv-expressing plasmids were amplified in E. coli and extracted and purified using an Endo Free Maxi plasmid kit (TIANGEN, China).

Expression and purification of NAb scFv

Single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies were expressed in ExpiCHO-S cells (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the CHO cells were routinely cultured at 37°C with ≥80% relative humidity and 8% CO2 in 125 mL flasks that were fixed in an orbital shaker platform at a speed of 125 rpm with a 25 mm shaking diameter. After the cell density reached 6 × 106 cells/ml, the cells were collected and resuspended in fresh media for transfection. The pcDNA3.4-scFv plasmid was transfected into ExpiCHO-S cells with an ExpiFectamine CHO transfection kit (Invitrogen, USA). An enhancer and feed component were added at 18 h post transfection according to a standard protocol. ScFv-containing supernatants were harvested 10 days after transfection. The expressed scFv was initially purified with a HisTrap excel column. The obtained eluate was concentrated using a 100 kDa ultrafiltration tube and then further purified by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex-200 increase 10/300 column and an AKTA plus protein purification system (GE Life Sciences, USA). The purity and size of each single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibody was assessed by SDS-PAGE. The concentrations of the final obtained scFvs were determined by measuring their corresponding absorption values at a wavelength of 280 nm.

Binding affinity measurement of R50 scFv

Baby hamster kidney-21 (BHK-21) cells in 24-well plate were respectively infected with different FMDV strains at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Subsequently, these infected cells were fixed and permeated for 20 min using a fixation and permeabilization solution (BD Biosciences, USA). After washing with PBS buffer, 1 × 106 infected cells/sample was stained with diluted R50-ScFv and subsequently incubated with anti-HIS FITC antibody (Genescript, China) and 3B4B1-Alexa647 (Fluorescence-labeled antibody (clone:3B4B1) against the nonstructural protein 3B of FMDV) for 30 min at room temperature (20–25°C). After two washes, the stained cells were loaded for FC (BD LSRFortessa, USA), and 10000 Alexa647 positive cells were recorded. The percent of FITC positive cells in Alexa647 positive cells was used to assess the binding activity of R50 scFv.

Virus neutralizing test

The NAb scFvs were titrated for viral neutralizing activity against three representative strains from the three topotypes of FMDV serotype O and the Asia topotype of FMDV serotype A by using a microneutralization assay as previously described[21]. The five strains of FMDV were O/Mya/98 (SEA topotype), O/HN/CHA/93 (Cathay topotype), O/Tibet/99 (ME-SA topotype), A/GDMM/CHA/2013 (genotype 2 in SEA-97 lineage of Asia topotype), and A/WH/CHA/09 (genotype 1 in SEA-97 lineage of Asia topotype). Briefly, scFv antibody samples were 2-fold serially diluted in 96-well cell culture plates in a total volume of 50 μl, and 100 TCID50 of FMDV in 50 μl of culture media was added to each well. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, ~5×104 BHK-21 cells in 100 μl of media were added to each well as an indicator of residual infectivity. Normal cell wells, and 10, 100, and 1,000 TCID50 virus control wells were used in each plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 48 h and then fixed in acetone-methanol (volume ratio = 1:1) and stained with a 0.2% crystal violet solution. The endpoint titer was determined as the reciprocal of the lowest antibody dilution to fully prevent a cytopathic effect (CPE) by 100 TCID50 FMDV in each well. The neutralizing activity was expressed as the virus neutralization (VN) titer, which was calculated as the initial antibody concentration divided by the endpoint titer.

Rescue and titration of mutated viruses

Full-length cDNAs were generated by the exchange-cassette strategy to replace the whole P1 coding region of an existing pOFS plasmid with the respective genes of O/Tibet/99 and A/WH/CHA/09. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce nucleic acid mutations to produce full-length cDNAs with single amino acid substitutions[35]. All mutant constructs were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. The mutant viruses were rescued as previously described[36]. Briefly, Not I-linearized mutant plasmids were transfected into BSR/T7 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 following the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfected cells were monitored daily for the appearance of CPE. At 72 h post transfection, culture supernatants were harvested and passaged on BHK-21 cells. The mutant virus titers were measured using the plaque forming unit (PFU) assay[37]. Confluent monolayers of BHK-21 cells were infected with 10-fold serially diluted FMDV samples in 6-well plates. The 0.6% Tragacanth gum was added after 1 h of incubation. Plaques were visualized at 48 h postinfection (p.i.) by fixing with acetone-methanol and staining with crystal violet. The amount of plaque was observed and statistically analyzed.

Generation of neutralization escape mutants

Neutralization escape mutants were generated through consecutive passages of FMDV in BHK-21 cells under the selective pressure of neutralizing scFv antibodies, according to a previous report with minor modifications[31]. Briefly, tenfold serial dilutions of FMDV (O/Tibet/99) in 50 μl were incubated with 50 μl of varying concentrations of scFv sample (20 μg/ml to 50 μg/ml) in 96-well microplates. The mixtures were used to infect 100 μl of BHK-21 cells (106 cells/ml), which were incubated at 37°C for 48 h to allow virus propagation to occur. The first passage virus was harvested from the wells seeded with the highest dilution of virus that produced an approximately 80–100% cytopathic effect (CPE). Subsequent rounds of pressure selection were performed in 24-well plates in which the passaged virus (200 μl) was incubated with an equal volume of twofold concentration of antibodies in each well containing 400 μl of BHK-21 cells. The harvested virus was subjected to several additional rounds of selection until it completely escaped from neutralization upon the addition of scFv at concentrations greater than 1 mg/ml. The P1 region of the obtained neutralization escape mutants was amplified by one-step RT-PCR as described previously[38] using the primers Pan204+: ACCTCCAACGGGTGGTACGC/NK61: GACATGTCCTCTTGCATCTG) and were subsequently verified by sequencing. Mutated amino acids were determined by aligning the entire mutant P1 region to its parent virus.

Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection

FMDV and antibodies were incubated at a molar ratio of 1:240 in a volume of 50 μl for 30 min (B77), 10 min (F145) and 30 s (R50) at 4°C. A 3 μl aliquot of the mixture was applied to a glow-discharged carbon-coated gold grid (GIG, Au 1.2/1.3, 200 mesh; Jiangsu Lantuo Biotechnology Co. Ltd., China). The grid was blotted for 5 s in 100% relative humidity and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot mark IV (Thermo Fisher, USA). The cryo-EM data were collected at 200 kV with a FEI Arctica (Thermo Fisher, USA) and a direct electron detector (Falcon II, Thermo Fisher) at Tsinghua University. Micrograph images were collected as movies (19 frames, 1.2 s) and recorded at −2.4 to −1.4 μm underfocus at a calibrated magnification of ×110 kX, resulting in a pixel size of 0.932 Å per pixel. The data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in S2 Table.

Image processing and three-dimensional reconstruction

Similar image processing procedures were employed for all data sets. Individual frames from each micrograph movie were aligned and averaged using MotionCor2[39] to produce drift-corrected images. Particles were picked and selected in Relion-2.1[40], and contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters were estimated using CTFFIND4[41] and integrated in Relion-2.1. Subsequent steps in three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction used Relion-2.1 in accordance with recommended gold-standard refinement procedures[40]. The final selected particles were further processed in THUNDER[42], which is a particle filter-based cryo-EM image processing software. The local defocus of each particle was determined by refining the defocus parameter during expectation maximization in THUNDER. For all reconstructions, the final resolution was assessed using the standard FSC = 0.143 criterion.

Model building and refinement

The X-ray structure of native FMDV O1BFS (PDB:1BBT)[43] was manually placed into the cryo-EM map for FMDV particles and rigid-body fitted with UCSF Chimera[44]. The X-ray structure of native BOV-7 (PDB: 6E9U)[23] was manually placed into the cryo-EM map for scFv and rigid-body fitted with UCSF Chimera[44]. The fitting was further improved with real-space refinement using Phenix[45]. Manual model building was performed using Coot[46] in combination with real-space refinement with Phenix[45] to adjust the mismatches between the model and the target protein. The density maps were kept constant during the entire fitting process, and the atomic coordinates were subjected to refinement. The additional structures reported in this work were built and refined by using FMDV (O/Tibet/99) particles as a starting model and rigid-body fitted and refined. Validation was conducted using the MolProbity function integrated within Phenix. The refinement statistics are presented in S2 Table.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Cryo-EM analysis of virus-NAb complex.

Typical electron micrographs were collected with a defocus of 2.0 μm (FMDV-OTi-B77), 1.9 μm (FMDV-OTi-F145), 1.5 μm (FMDV-OTi-R50) and 1.7 μm (FMDV-AWH-R50) (Scale bar, 1000 Å). Selected 2D class averages both show prominent spikes on the outer surface of viral particles (Scale bar, 480 Å). Fourier shell correlation (FSC) of the final 3D reconstruction after gold-standard refinement using RELION and THUNDER. The resolution corresponding to an FSC of 0.143 is shown for these virus-antibody complexes. FSC curves are plotted before (gray) and after (yellow) masking in addition to post correction (orange), accounting for the effect of the mask using phase randomization.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Cryo-EM density maps of virus-NAb complex.

Surface representation of the density maps for a protomer of these complexes. VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are blue, green, red and yellow; VH and VL of B77 are purple and orange; and VH and VL of F145 are cyan and brown, respectively. The VH and VL of R50(FMDV-OTi-R50) are magenta and dark violet, and the VH and VL of R50(FMDV-AWH-R50) are yellow orange and limon, respectively. In the right panel, atomic models shown as sticks are superimposed to indicate the representative regions in wire frames. In the stick models, the residue numbers are indicated. The VP1, VP2 and VH residues are labeled with a subscript. Black dashed circles show the densities of the bound NAbs away from the contact surface. The densities are not sufficiently clear to trace all main chains.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Cryo-EM structures.

Structures of the FMDV-OTi-F145 complex, FMDV-OTi-R50 complex and FMDV-AWH-R50 complex are shown in surface representation. The border of one protomer is indicated by a sky-blue line. The VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are shown in blue, green, red and yellow, while the VH and VL are shown in purple and orange, respectively.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Superposition of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH.

Protomers of FMDV-OTi (VP1: blue, VP2: green, VP3: red) and FMDV-AWH (gray) are aligned and shown as ribbon diagram in the same orientation. The VP2 BC-loop and HI-loop are framed and shown in a close-up view in the right panel.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Titrations of FMDV-OTi and mutants.

(A) Titrations of rescued viruses with indicated mutations in the virus-antibody interface. The data are shown as the mean of triplicates with S.D. (B) Plaques formed in BHK-21 cells by wild-type and mutants. The patterns of CPE correlated with the plaque size.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Titrations of FMDV-AWH and mutants.

(A) Titrations of rescued viruses with indicated mutations in the virus-antibody interface. The data are shown as the mean of triplicates with S.D. (B) Plaques formed in BHK-21 cells by wild-type and mutants. The patterns of CPE correlated with the plaque size.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Binding modes of FMDV receptor and antibody.

Binding modes of receptor [integrin (avβ6) and heparin sulfate (HS)] and scFv antibody B77 (A), F145 (B) and R50 (C, D). The panel shows a view down onto the capsid surface. VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are blue, green, red and yellow, respectively. The integrin (avβ6) and antibodies (B77, F145 and R50) are drawn in ribbon diagram; integrin (avβ6) is orange and antibodies (B77, F145 and R50) are purple. The heparin sulfate (HS) is drawn in cyan stick representation. Black dashed circles show significant clashes between antibody (B77 and F145) and integrin receptor.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Footprint of R50 and receptor on the FMDV surface.

Residues identified for R50 are indicated in magenta, and residues identified for heparin sulfate (HS) and integrin (generally avβ6) are indicated in cyan and orange, respectively. The border of one protomer is indicated by a yellow line.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Negative stain analysis.

(A, B) Negative stain EM analysis of FMDV-OTi (A) or FMDV-AWH particles when incubated with R50 at 4°C for 30s or 60s. Red circle: pentamer, top view. Yellow circle: pentamer, side view. (C) Negative stain EM analysis of FMDV-OTi particles when incubated with B77 at 4°C for 30 min or 60 min.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Antigen sites recognized by mouse monoclonal antibodies and R50.

Sites 1–5 identified for murine monoclonal antibodies are indicated in magenta; residues identified for R50 are indicated in pink.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Nested PCR primers used for amplifying variable regions of cattle IgG.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Cryo-EM data collection and refinement statistics.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. HCDR3 amino acid sequences of bovine antibodies.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. FMDV-OTi-B77 interaction residues.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. FMDV-OTi-F145 interaction residues.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. FMDV-OTi-R50 interaction residues.

(DOCX)

S7 Table. FMDV-AWH-R50 interaction residues.

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Selection of neutralization-resistant FMDV.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Computing and Cryo-EM Platforms of Tsinghua University, Branch of the National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing) for providing facilities.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The cryo-EM density maps and the structures were deposited into the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) and Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the following accession numbers: FMDV-OTi-B77, EMD-30558, PDB 7D3K; FMDV-OTi-F145, EMD-30559, PDB 7D3L; FMDV-OTi-R50, EMD-30560, PDB 7D3M; and FMDV-AWH-R50, EMD-30565, PDB 7D3R.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Program on Key Research Project of China [(2020YFA0707500, to Z.L.), (2017YFC0840300, to Z.R.), (2016YFD0501500, to Z. Liu)] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [(31902288, to K.L.), (32072873, to Y.C.)]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Grubman MJ, Baxt B. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(2):465–93. Epub 2004/04/16. 10.1128/cmr.17.2.465-493.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kandeil A, El-Shesheny R, Kayali G, Moatasim Y, Bagato O, Darwish M, et al. Characterization of the recent outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype SAT2 in Egypt. Archives of virology. 2013;158(3):619–27. Epub 2012/11/08. 10.1007/s00705-012-1529-y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muroga N, Hayama Y, Yamamoto T, Kurogi A, Tsuda T, Tsutsui T. The 2010 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Japan. The Journal of veterinary medical science. 2012;74(4):399–404. Epub 2011/11/15. 10.1292/jvms.11-0271 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bachrach HL. Foot-and-mouth disease. Annual review of microbiology. 1968;22:201–44. Epub 1968/01/01. 10.1146/annurev.mi.22.100168.001221 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayelet G, Mahapatra M, Gelaye E, Egziabher BG, Rufeal T, Sahle M, et al. Genetic characterization of foot-and-mouth disease viruses, Ethiopia, 1981–2007. Emerging infectious diseases. 2009;15(9):1409–17. Epub 2009/10/01. 10.3201/eid1509.090091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rweyemamu M, Roeder P, Mackay D, Sumption K, Brownlie J, Leforban Y, et al. Epidemiological patterns of foot-and-mouth disease worldwide. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2008;55(1):57–72. Epub 2008/04/10. 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2007.01013.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mignaqui AC, Ruiz V, Durocher Y, Wigdorovitz A. Advances in novel vaccines for foot and mouth disease: focus on recombinant empty capsids. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39(3):306–20. Epub 2019/01/19. 10.1080/07388551.2018.1554619 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Paton DJ, Valarcher JF, Bergmann I, Matlho OG, Zakharov VM, Palma EL, et al. Selection of foot and mouth disease vaccine strains—a review. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics). 2005;24(3):981–93. Epub 2006/04/29. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brehm KE, Kumar N, Thulke HH, Haas B. High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine. 2008;26(13):1681–7. Epub 2008/03/04. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.038 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maree FF, Blignaut B, Esterhuysen JJ, de Beer TAP, Theron J, O’Neill HG, et al. Predicting antigenic sites on the foot-and-mouth disease virus capsid of the South African Territories types using virus neutralization data. The Journal of general virology. 2011;92(Pt 10):2297–309. Epub 2011/06/24. 10.1099/vir.0.032839-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reeve R, Blignaut B, Esterhuysen JJ, Opperman P, Matthews L, Fry EE, et al. Sequence-based prediction for vaccine strain selection and identification of antigenic variability in foot-and-mouth disease virus. PLoS computational biology. 2010;6(12):e1001027. Epub 2010/12/15. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Acharya R, Fry E, Stuart D, Fox G, Rowlands D, Brown F. The three-dimensional structure of foot-and-mouth disease virus at 2.9 A resolution. Nature. 1989;337(6209):709–16. Epub 1989/02/23. 10.1038/337709a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morrell DJ, Mellor EJ, Rowlands DJ, Brown F. Surface structure and RNA-protein interactions of foot-and-mouth disease virus. The Journal of general virology. 1987;68 (Pt 6):1649–58. Epub 1987/06/01. 10.1099/0022-1317-68-6-1649 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mateu MG, Rocha E, Vicente O, Vayreda F, Navalpotro C, Andreu D, et al. Reactivity with monoclonal antibodies of viruses from an episode of foot-and-mouth disease. Virus research. 1987;8(3):261–74. Epub 1987/09/01. 10.1016/0168-1702(87)90020-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hewat EA, Verdaguer N, Fita I, Blakemore W, Brookes S, King A, et al. Structure of the complex of an Fab fragment of a neutralizing antibody with foot-and-mouth disease virus: positioning of a highly mobile antigenic loop. The EMBO journal. 1997;16(7):1492–500. Epub 1997/04/01. 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berens SJ, Wylie DE, Lopez OJ. Use of a single VH family and long CDR3s in the variable region of cattle Ig heavy chains. International immunology. 1997;9(1):189–99. Epub 1997/01/01. 10.1093/intimm/9.1.189 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saini SS, Kaushik A. Extensive CDR3H length heterogeneity exists in bovine foetal VDJ rearrangements. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2002;55(2):140–8. Epub 2002/03/19. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01028.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haakenson JK, Huang R, Smider VV. Diversity in the Cow Ultralong CDR H3 Antibody Repertoire. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1262. Epub 2018/06/20. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sok D, Le KM, Vadnais M, Saye-Francisco KL, Jardine JG, Torres JL, et al. Rapid elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV by immunization in cows. Nature. 2017;548(7665):108–11. Epub 2017/07/21. 10.1038/nature23301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li K, Wang S, Cao Y, Bao H, Li P, Sun P, et al. Development of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Derived From Plasmablasts of Infected Cattle and Their Germline Gene Usage. Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:2870. Epub 2019/12/24. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Golde WT, Pacheco JM, Duque H, Doel T, Penfold B, Ferman GS, et al. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus confers complete clinical protection in 7 days and partial protection in 4 days: Use in emergency outbreak response. Vaccine. 2005;23(50):5775–82. Epub 2005/09/13. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.043 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koti M, Kataeva G, Kaushik AK. Novel atypical nucleotide insertions specifically at VH-DH junction generate exceptionally long CDR3H in cattle antibodies. Molecular immunology. 2010;47(11–12):2119–28. Epub 2010/05/04. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.02.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dong J, Finn JA, Larsen PA, Smith TPL, Crowe JE. Structural Diversity of Ultralong CDRH3s in Seven Bovine Antibody Heavy Chains. Front Immunol. 2019;10:558. Epub 2019/04/11. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fry EE, Lea SM, Jackson T, Newman JW, Ellard FM, Blakemore WE, et al. The structure and function of a foot-and-mouth disease virus-oligosaccharide receptor complex. The EMBO journal. 1999;18(3):543–54. Epub 1999/02/02. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kotecha A, Wang Q, Dong X, Ilca SL, Ondiviela M, Zihe R, et al. Rules of engagement between αvβ6 integrin and foot-and-mouth disease virus. Nature communications. 2017;8:15408. Epub 2017/05/24. 10.1038/ncomms15408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jackson T, Ellard FM, Ghazaleh RA, Brookes SM, Blakemore WE, Corteyn AH, et al. Efficient infection of cells in culture by type O foot-and-mouth disease virus requires binding to cell surface heparan sulfate. J Virol. 1996;70(8):5282–7. Epub 1996/08/01. 10.1128/JVI.70.8.5282-5287.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhu L, Xu K, Wang N, Cao L, Wu J, Gao Q, et al. Neutralization Mechanisms of Two Highly Potent Antibodies against Human Enterovirus 71. mBio. 2018;9(4). Epub 2018/07/05. 10.1128/mBio.01013-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Diaz-San Segundo F, Medina GN, Stenfeldt C, Arzt J, de Los Santos T. Foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Veterinary microbiology. 2017;206:102–12. Epub 2017/01/04. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee SY, Lee YJ, Kim RH, Park JN, Park ME, Ko MK, et al. Rapid Engineering of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine and Challenge Viruses. J Virol. 2017;91(16). Epub 2017/06/02. 10.1128/JVI.00155-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lei Y, Shao J, Zhao F, Li Y, Lei C, Ma F, et al. Artificially designed hepatitis B virus core particles composed of multiple epitopes of type A and O foot-and-mouth disease virus as a bivalent vaccine candidate. Journal of medical virology. 2019;91(12):2142–52. Epub 2019/07/28. 10.1002/jmv.25554 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xie QC, McCahon D, Crowther JR, Belsham GJ, McCullough KC. Neutralization of foot-and-mouth disease virus can be mediated through any of at least three separate antigenic sites. The Journal of general virology. 1987;68 (Pt 6):1637–47. Epub 1987/06/01. 10.1099/0022-1317-68-6-1637 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McCahon D, Crowther JR, Belsham GJ, Kitson JD, Duchesne M, Have P, et al. Evidence for at least four antigenic sites on type O foot-and-mouth disease virus involved in neutralization; identification by single and multiple site monoclonal antibody-resistant mutants. The Journal of general virology. 1989;70 (Pt 3):639–45. Epub 1989/03/01. 10.1099/0022-1317-70-3-639 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kitson JD, McCahon D, Belsham GJ. Sequence analysis of monoclonal antibody resistant mutants of type O foot and mouth disease virus: evidence for the involvement of the three surface exposed capsid proteins in four antigenic sites. Virology. 1990;179(1):26–34. Epub 1990/11/01. 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90269-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Crowther JR, Farias S, Carpenter WC, Samuel AR. Identification of a fifth neutralizable site on type O foot-and-mouth disease virus following characterization of single and quintuple monoclonal antibody escape mutants. The Journal of general virology. 1993;74 (Pt 8):1547–53. Epub 1993/08/01. 10.1099/0022-1317-74-8-1547 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bai XW, Bao HF, Li PH, Ma XQ, Sun P, Bai QF, et al. Engineering Responses to Amino Acid Substitutions in the VP0- and VP3-Coding Regions of PanAsia-1 Strains of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype O. Journal of virology. 2019;93(7). Epub 2019/02/01. 10.1128/JVI.02278-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li P, Bai X, Sun P, Li D, Lu Z, Cao Y, et al. Evaluation of a genetically modified foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine candidate generated by reverse genetics. BMC veterinary research. 2012;8:57. Epub 2012/05/18. 10.1186/1746-6148-8-57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fan W, Zhang D, Qian P, Qian S, Wu M, Chen H, et al. Swine TRIM21 restricts FMDV infection via an intracellular neutralization mechanism. Antiviral research. 2016;127:32–40. Epub 2016/01/19. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.01.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bai X, Bao H, Li P, Sun P, Kuang W, Cao Y, et al. Genetic characterization of the cell-adapted PanAsia strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus O/Fujian/CHA/5/99 isolated from swine. Virology journal. 2010;7:208. Epub 2010/09/03. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li X, Mooney P, Zheng S, Booth CR, Braunfeld MB, Gubbens S, et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature methods. 2013;10(6):584–90. Epub 2013/05/07. 10.1038/nmeth.2472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Scheres SH. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. Journal of structural biology. 2012;180(3):519–30. Epub 2012/09/25. 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mindell JA, Grigorieff N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. Journal of structural biology. 2003;142(3):334–47. Epub 2003/06/05. 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00069-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hu M, Yu H, Gu K, Wang Z, Ruan H, Wang K, et al. A particle-filter framework for robust cryo-EM 3D reconstruction. Nat Methods. 2018;15(12):1083–9. 10.1038/s41592-018-0223-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fry E, Acharya R, Stuart D. Methods used in the structure determination of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Acta crystallographica Section A, Foundations of crystallography. 1993;49 (Pt 1):45–55. Epub 1993/01/01. 10.1107/s0108767392005737 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of computational chemistry. 2004;25(13):1605–12. Epub 2004/07/21. 10.1002/jcc.20084 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Mustyakimov M, et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012;68(Pt 4):352–67. Epub 2012/04/17. 10.1107/S0907444912001308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 4):486–501. Epub 2010/04/13. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Richard J Kuhn, Guangxiang George Luo

28 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Lou,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Structures of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

Please respond to all of the reviewers' comments. These will be evaluated and may be resent to the reviewers so do address all concerns.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Richard J. Kuhn, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Guangxiang Luo

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Please respond to all of the reviewers' comments. These will be evaluated and may be resent to the reviewers so do address all concerns.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: In this study the authors take two previously identified antibodies that are specific for binding to the FMDV O serotype. They also identify one antibody that binds both O and A serotypes. The authors express the antibody, anddo CryoEM on all three binding antibodies to there respective serotype. The authors then find some mutants in the area by co-incubating with antibody. This report has some nice Cryo-EM data, and nice mapping of antibody-capsid interactions. However I am not convinced that this area will/could be used for a universal FMDV vaccine. Particularly without real neutralization data showing cross reactivity between a diverse set of within serotype(s) and comparing other serotypes as well, Asia, C, etc.

1. The authors do not show any neutralization assay for the new cross-reactive antibody to any virus. Levels of cross neutralization between multiple isolates in the 0 and A serotypes should be included. A binding antibody does not mean neutralization. The level of neutralization is also important. Does this cross reactive antibody neutralize 0 serotypes at the same levels as the two previously identified antibody's? Does it neutralize the A serotype at the same level?

2. In the search for a universal FMDV vaccine as the authors describe, it is important that the side of binding is highly conserved among within serotype and between serotypes. Is the identified area conserved, and how high affinity does this antibody bind? It would be good to see a isolate that doesn't have this region conserved as a control.

3. The authors examine mutants in the ab-interface, most do not show a real decrease, with only a couple showing one log decrease. This is interesting, how do these mutants change binding affinity or neutralization using the new antibody?

4. It would be interesting if this new antibody could be tested in an animal experiment to show antibody treatment can prevent infection for both A and 0 serotypes.

Reviewer #2: Structures of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization

This study describes the first structures of FMDV-antibody interactions using mAbs isolated from a natural bovine host and shows the potential importance of the long HCDR3 in bovine antibodies against FMDV. One of the mAbs (isolated after sequential infection with two different serotypes of the virus) is able to neutralise both of these serotypes. This is a breakthrough in the field of FMDV (cross-reactive mAbs are usually non-neutralising) and may be due to the long HCDR3 allowing binding into a depression which may not be so accessible to the murine mAbs historically used to map the antigenicity of FMDV. This is novel and important information for both FMDV and for bovine antibodies which is comprehensively described and generally well supported by the data.

Generally well written but parts of this paper are difficult to follow. Several parts of the story require reference to the 20 items of supplementary material, why can’t more of these be included in the main body? The rationale and flow for how the approaches are linked could be clearer. Subheadings which provide a description/take home of the main findings would be helpful in guiding the reader through the story.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: see above.

Reviewer #2: R50 induced virus dissociation: What are the control conditions, I think the controls for this should include other neutralising mAb/scFv which presumably will not induce dissociation? See additional comments on this in the minor issues section.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: none

Reviewer #2: Introduction

It is suggested that bovine antibodies with ultralong HCDR3 may be better for producing high-affinity and broadly neutralizing antibodies. I understand this was the case for bovine antibodies identified to have broadly neutralising activity against HIV but what is the general basis for the advantage? Can an antibody with longer HCDR3 make contact with a conserved epitope comprising more distant amino acids, or perhaps tolerate more variation in the positioning of components of a conserved epitope?

It is proposed that this study will 'inform a structure-based rationale to design a universal FMDV vaccine'. I wondered if the authors would like to elaborate on this rationale, could this be mentioned in the discussion?

Isolation of antibodies from bovine plasmablasts

Fig 1A I don’t understand the gating strategy based on the text in the results section and the figure legend. Please can this be explained more clearly? For example, the schematic in the figure splits into ‘FMO’ and ‘sample’ what are these? It would also be interesting to provide brief summary in the main text of how the animals were infected, how many B cells were sorted, what proportion were FMDV-specific and how many FMDV reactive B cells were characterised in order to find the three mAbs described. Can this information be extrapolated to discuss the proportion of cross-reactive antibodies that could be expected in the polyclonal response? How do the neutralising titres of the three scFv compare with the range of titres generally expected for FMDV reactive mAbs?

Overall architectures of the FMDV-NAb complexes

Three copies of B77 and F145 clearly bind to sites located closely around the 3-fold axis. R50 is described as binding near the quasi-5-fold axis, but it doesn’t seem to me to be particularly near to the 5-fold or really any symmetry axis. If anything, the closest feature seems to be the pentamer-pentamer boundary across the 2-fold and this is also where the signal is seen in the maps. So I don’t really understand why the R50 binding site is described as near the 5-fold and chosen to be displayed as binding round the 5-fold. Perhaps this should be explained?

Interaction of B77 and F145 with FMDV-OTi

Neutralisation is suggested as being by steric hindrance to integrin receptor binding. Can the authors comment on the receptor usage of these viruses, they are grown in BHK cells suggesting they are cell culture adapted to use heparan sulphate so may not require integrins, would this change the interpretation?

Determinant for the serotype O-specificity of F145 and B77

Lines 209-219: Apologies but I could not understand all of this section. The rationale for this section is not clear. Are you creating new ‘artificial escape mutant viruses’ here by reverse genetics? The text says into FMDV-AWH but then in the rest of the section only the O virus is described… I think this section needs to be made more clear.

FMDV-OTi-R50 and FMDV-AWH-R50 interfaces

Figures 4 and 5 are beautiful but if the orientation of the structure must be changed between the parts of the figure it would help if this was pointed out (e.g. the view of the enlarged inset panels is rotated).

R50 induced virus dissociation: how does the molar ratio of R50 used for dissociation compare with the concentrations of R50 used in the neutralisation experiments? What are the control conditions, I think the controls for this should include other neutralising mAb/scFv which presumably will not induce dissociation? The EM images are not high enough magnification to see the presence of the highlighted pentamers, could an enlarged inset be used to convey this point? Not a requirement but sucrose density gradient analysis would provide more positive evidence for dissociation into pentamers. A few words to introduce the dissociation of FMDV would also be useful and perhaps discussion somewhere of other mAbs with similar properties against FMDV or comparable destabilisation of other picornaviruses would also be useful.

Fig S5 seems to have a problem with poor quality plaque assay images.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Attachment

Submitted filename: review.docx

Decision Letter 1

Richard J Kuhn, Guangxiang George Luo

25 Mar 2021

Dear Dr. Lou,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Structures of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Richard J. Kuhn, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Guangxiang Luo

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

The authors have responded to all queries and have made substantial improvements to the manuscript.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Richard J Kuhn, Guangxiang George Luo

14 Apr 2021

Dear Dr. Lou,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Structures of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus with neutralizing antibodies derived from recovered natural host reveal a mechanism for cross-serotype neutralization," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Cryo-EM analysis of virus-NAb complex.

    Typical electron micrographs were collected with a defocus of 2.0 μm (FMDV-OTi-B77), 1.9 μm (FMDV-OTi-F145), 1.5 μm (FMDV-OTi-R50) and 1.7 μm (FMDV-AWH-R50) (Scale bar, 1000 Å). Selected 2D class averages both show prominent spikes on the outer surface of viral particles (Scale bar, 480 Å). Fourier shell correlation (FSC) of the final 3D reconstruction after gold-standard refinement using RELION and THUNDER. The resolution corresponding to an FSC of 0.143 is shown for these virus-antibody complexes. FSC curves are plotted before (gray) and after (yellow) masking in addition to post correction (orange), accounting for the effect of the mask using phase randomization.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Cryo-EM density maps of virus-NAb complex.

    Surface representation of the density maps for a protomer of these complexes. VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are blue, green, red and yellow; VH and VL of B77 are purple and orange; and VH and VL of F145 are cyan and brown, respectively. The VH and VL of R50(FMDV-OTi-R50) are magenta and dark violet, and the VH and VL of R50(FMDV-AWH-R50) are yellow orange and limon, respectively. In the right panel, atomic models shown as sticks are superimposed to indicate the representative regions in wire frames. In the stick models, the residue numbers are indicated. The VP1, VP2 and VH residues are labeled with a subscript. Black dashed circles show the densities of the bound NAbs away from the contact surface. The densities are not sufficiently clear to trace all main chains.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Cryo-EM structures.

    Structures of the FMDV-OTi-F145 complex, FMDV-OTi-R50 complex and FMDV-AWH-R50 complex are shown in surface representation. The border of one protomer is indicated by a sky-blue line. The VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are shown in blue, green, red and yellow, while the VH and VL are shown in purple and orange, respectively.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Superposition of FMDV-OTi and FMDV-AWH.

    Protomers of FMDV-OTi (VP1: blue, VP2: green, VP3: red) and FMDV-AWH (gray) are aligned and shown as ribbon diagram in the same orientation. The VP2 BC-loop and HI-loop are framed and shown in a close-up view in the right panel.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Titrations of FMDV-OTi and mutants.

    (A) Titrations of rescued viruses with indicated mutations in the virus-antibody interface. The data are shown as the mean of triplicates with S.D. (B) Plaques formed in BHK-21 cells by wild-type and mutants. The patterns of CPE correlated with the plaque size.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Titrations of FMDV-AWH and mutants.

    (A) Titrations of rescued viruses with indicated mutations in the virus-antibody interface. The data are shown as the mean of triplicates with S.D. (B) Plaques formed in BHK-21 cells by wild-type and mutants. The patterns of CPE correlated with the plaque size.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Binding modes of FMDV receptor and antibody.

    Binding modes of receptor [integrin (avβ6) and heparin sulfate (HS)] and scFv antibody B77 (A), F145 (B) and R50 (C, D). The panel shows a view down onto the capsid surface. VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4 of the protomer are blue, green, red and yellow, respectively. The integrin (avβ6) and antibodies (B77, F145 and R50) are drawn in ribbon diagram; integrin (avβ6) is orange and antibodies (B77, F145 and R50) are purple. The heparin sulfate (HS) is drawn in cyan stick representation. Black dashed circles show significant clashes between antibody (B77 and F145) and integrin receptor.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Footprint of R50 and receptor on the FMDV surface.

    Residues identified for R50 are indicated in magenta, and residues identified for heparin sulfate (HS) and integrin (generally avβ6) are indicated in cyan and orange, respectively. The border of one protomer is indicated by a yellow line.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Negative stain analysis.

    (A, B) Negative stain EM analysis of FMDV-OTi (A) or FMDV-AWH particles when incubated with R50 at 4°C for 30s or 60s. Red circle: pentamer, top view. Yellow circle: pentamer, side view. (C) Negative stain EM analysis of FMDV-OTi particles when incubated with B77 at 4°C for 30 min or 60 min.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Antigen sites recognized by mouse monoclonal antibodies and R50.

    Sites 1–5 identified for murine monoclonal antibodies are indicated in magenta; residues identified for R50 are indicated in pink.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Nested PCR primers used for amplifying variable regions of cattle IgG.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Cryo-EM data collection and refinement statistics.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. HCDR3 amino acid sequences of bovine antibodies.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. FMDV-OTi-B77 interaction residues.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. FMDV-OTi-F145 interaction residues.

    (DOCX)

    S6 Table. FMDV-OTi-R50 interaction residues.

    (DOCX)

    S7 Table. FMDV-AWH-R50 interaction residues.

    (DOCX)

    S8 Table. Selection of neutralization-resistant FMDV.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The cryo-EM density maps and the structures were deposited into the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) and Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the following accession numbers: FMDV-OTi-B77, EMD-30558, PDB 7D3K; FMDV-OTi-F145, EMD-30559, PDB 7D3L; FMDV-OTi-R50, EMD-30560, PDB 7D3M; and FMDV-AWH-R50, EMD-30565, PDB 7D3R.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES